• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
User's perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing quality colonoscopy services in Canada: a study protocol.用户对加拿大实施高质量结肠镜检查服务的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2010 Nov 2;5:85. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-85.
2
Users' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing EHR in Canada: a study protocol.用户视角下加拿大电子健康记录实施的障碍和促进因素:研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2009 Apr 9;4:20. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-20.
3
Communication partner training with familiar partners of people with aphasia: A systematic review and synthesis of barriers and facilitators to implementation.与失语症患者熟悉伙伴的沟通伙伴培训:实施障碍与促进因素的系统评价与综合分析
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Mar;58(2):601-628. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12805. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Implementing organized colorectal cancer screening programs in Europe-protocol for a systematic review of determinants and strategies.在欧洲实施有组织的结直肠癌筛查计划——系统评价决定因素和策略的方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;12(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02193-6.
5
Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.比较用户群体对实施电子健康记录的障碍和促进因素的观点:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2011 Apr 28;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-46.
6
Case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs: an implementation and realist evaluation protocol.基层医疗中对患有慢性病和复杂护理需求的高频医疗服务使用者的病例管理:实施和现实主义评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e026433. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026433.
7
Implementation of an Electronic Mental Health Platform for Youth and Young Adults in a School Context Across Alberta, Canada: Thematic Analysis of the Perspectives of Stakeholders.在加拿大艾伯塔省的学校环境中为青年和年轻成年人实施电子心理健康平台:利益相关者观点的主题分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jan 17;11:e49099. doi: 10.2196/49099.
8
Barriers and facilitators for colorectal cancer screening in a low-income urban community in Mexico City.墨西哥城低收入城市社区中结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Jul 10;1:64. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00055-z. eCollection 2020.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review.结肠镜检查服务中实施持续质量改进计划的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法的系统评价
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Feb;4(2):E118-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107901. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer.结肠镜检查后结直肠癌死亡率的降低因癌症部位而异。
Gastroenterology. 2010 Oct;139(4):1128-37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.052. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
2
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
3
Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.单次乙状结肠镜筛查预防结直肠癌:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2010 May 8;375(9726):1624-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
4
Is the effectiveness of colonoscopy "good enough" for population-based screening?结肠镜检查用于人群筛查的效果“足够好”吗?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jan 20;102(2):70-1. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp469. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
5
Endoscopist specialty is associated with incident colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy.内镜医生专业与阴性结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌发病相关。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Mar;8(3):275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.10.022. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
6
Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals.促进医疗保健专业人员采用信息和通信技术的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD006093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006093.pub2.
7
Factors influencing patient satisfaction when undergoing endoscopic procedures.内镜手术过程中影响患者满意度的因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):883-91, quiz 891.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.024. Epub 2009 Jan 18.
8
Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice.门诊结肠镜检查后的出血和穿孔及其在日常临床实践中的危险因素。
Gastroenterology. 2008 Dec;135(6):1899-1906, 1906.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.058. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
9
Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study.结肠镜检查结果为阴性后发生近端与远端结直肠癌的风险:一项基于人群的研究。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Oct;6(10):1117-21; quiz 1064. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.016. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
10
Facilitators and challenges to start-up of the colorectal cancer screening demonstration program.结直肠癌筛查示范项目启动的促进因素与挑战
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Apr;5(2):A39. Epub 2008 Mar 15.

用户对加拿大实施高质量结肠镜检查服务的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项研究方案。

User's perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing quality colonoscopy services in Canada: a study protocol.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2010 Nov 2;5:85. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-85.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-5-85
PMID:21044332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2988067/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a serious and growing health problem in Canada. Colonoscopy is used for screening and diagnosis of symptomatic or high CRC risk individuals. Although a number of countries are now implementing quality colonoscopy services, knowledge synthesis of barriers and facilitators perceived by healthcare professionals and patients during implementation has not been carried out. In addition, the perspectives of various stakeholders towards the implementation of quality colonoscopy services and the need of an efficient organisation of such services have been reported in the literature but have not been synthesised yet. The present study aims to produce a comprehensive synthesis of actual knowledge on the barriers and facilitators perceived by all stakeholders to the implementation of quality colonoscopy services in Canada.

METHODS

First, we will conduct a comprehensive review of the scientific literature and other published documentation on the barriers and facilitators to implementing quality colonoscopy services. Standardised literature searches and data extraction methods will be used. The quality of the studies and their relevance to informing decisions on colonoscopy services implementation will be assessed. For each group of users identified, barriers and facilitators will be categorised and compiled using narrative synthesis and meta-analytical techniques. The principle factors identified for each group of users will then be validated for its applicability to various Canadian contexts using the Delphi study method. Following this study, a set of strategies will be identified to inform decision makers involved in the implementation of quality colonoscopy services across Canadian jurisdictions.

DISCUSSION

This study will be the first to systematically summarise the barriers and facilitators to implementation of quality colonoscopy services perceived by different groups and to consider the local contexts in order to ensure the applicability of this knowledge to the particular realities of various Canadian jurisdictions. Linkages with strategic partners and decision makers in the realisation of this project will favour the utilisation of its results to support strategies for implementing quality colonoscopy services and CRC screening programs in the Canadian health system.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)在加拿大是一个严重且日益严重的健康问题。结肠镜检查用于筛查和诊断有症状或 CRC 风险高的个体。尽管许多国家现在正在实施质量结肠镜检查服务,但尚未对医疗保健专业人员和患者在实施过程中感知到的障碍和促进因素进行知识综合。此外,文献中已经报道了不同利益相关者对实施质量结肠镜检查服务的看法以及对这种服务进行有效组织的需求,但尚未进行综合。本研究旨在综合所有利益相关者对在加拿大实施质量结肠镜检查服务的障碍和促进因素的实际知识。

方法

首先,我们将对有关实施质量结肠镜检查服务的障碍和促进因素的科学文献和其他已发表文献进行全面综述。将使用标准化的文献搜索和数据提取方法。将评估研究的质量及其对结肠镜检查服务实施决策的相关性。对于确定的每个用户组,将使用叙述性综合和荟萃分析技术对障碍和促进因素进行分类和汇编。然后,使用德尔菲研究方法,验证针对每个用户组确定的主要因素在各种加拿大背景下的适用性。在这项研究之后,将确定一系列策略,为参与加拿大各司法管辖区质量结肠镜检查服务实施的决策者提供信息。

讨论

这项研究将首次系统地总结不同群体对实施质量结肠镜检查服务的障碍和促进因素的看法,并考虑当地情况,以确保该知识适用于各种加拿大司法管辖区的具体现实。与战略合作伙伴和决策者在该项目中的联系将有利于利用其结果来支持在加拿大卫生系统中实施质量结肠镜检查服务和 CRC 筛查计划的策略。