• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中对患有慢性病和复杂护理需求的高频医疗服务使用者的病例管理:实施和现实主义评估方案。

Case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs: an implementation and realist evaluation protocol.

机构信息

Département de Médecine de Famille et Médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

Département des Sciences de la Santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e026433. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026433.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026433
PMID:30478129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6254422/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Significant evidence in the literature supports case management (CM) as an effective intervention to improve care for patients with complex healthcare needs. However, there is still little evidence about the facilitators and barriers to CM implementation in primary care setting. The three specific objectives of this study are to: (1) identify the facilitators and barriers of CM implementation in primary care clinics across Canada; (2) explain and understand the relationships between the actors, contextual factors, mechanisms and outcomes of the CM intervention; (3) identify the next steps towards CM spread in primary care across Canada.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a multiple-case embedded mixed methods study. CM will be implemented in 10 primary care clinics in five Canadian provinces. Three different units of analysis will be embedded to obtain an in-depth understanding of each case: the healthcare system (macro level), the CM intervention in the clinics (meso level) and the individual/patient (micro level). For each objective, the following strategy will be performed: (1) an implementation analysis, (2) a realist evaluation and (3) consensus building among stakeholders using the Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts method.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study, which received ethics approval, will provide innovative knowledge about facilitators and barriers to implementation of CM in different primary care jurisdictions and will explain how and why different mechanisms operate in different contexts to generate different outcomes among frequent users. Consensual and prioritised statements about next steps for spread of CM in primary care from the perspectives of all stakeholders will be provided. Our results will offer context-sensitive explanations that can better inform local practices and policies and contribute to improve the health of patients with complex healthcare needs who frequently use healthcare services. Ultimately, this will increase the performance of healthcare systems and specifically mitigate ineffective use and costs.

摘要

简介

文献中有大量证据表明,病例管理(CM)作为一种有效的干预措施,可以改善有复杂医疗需求的患者的护理。然而,关于在初级保健环境中实施 CM 的促进因素和障碍,仍几乎没有证据。本研究的三个具体目标是:(1)确定加拿大各地初级保健诊所实施 CM 的促进因素和障碍;(2)解释和理解 CM 干预措施中各参与者、情境因素、机制和结果之间的关系;(3)确定在加拿大各地向初级保健推广 CM 的下一步措施。

方法与分析

我们将进行一项多案例嵌入式混合方法研究。CM 将在加拿大五个省份的 10 个初级保健诊所实施。将嵌入三个不同的分析单位,以深入了解每个案例:医疗保健系统(宏观层面)、诊所中的 CM 干预(中观层面)和个体/患者(微观层面)。对于每个目标,将执行以下策略:(1)实施分析,(2)现实评估,(3)使用专家组动画信息研究技术在利益相关者中达成共识。

伦理与传播

这项获得伦理批准的研究将提供有关在不同初级保健管辖区实施 CM 的促进因素和障碍的创新知识,并解释不同机制如何以及为何在不同情境中运作以在频繁使用者中产生不同的结果。将从所有利益相关者的角度提供关于在初级保健中推广 CM 的下一步措施的共识和优先事项声明。我们的研究结果将提供对情境敏感的解释,从而更好地为当地实践和政策提供信息,并有助于改善经常使用医疗保健服务的有复杂医疗需求的患者的健康。最终,这将提高医疗保健系统的绩效,并特别减轻低效使用和成本。

相似文献

1
Case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs: an implementation and realist evaluation protocol.基层医疗中对患有慢性病和复杂护理需求的高频医疗服务使用者的病例管理:实施和现实主义评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e026433. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026433.
2
Protocol for a mixed-method analysis of implementation of case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs.针对患有慢性病且有复杂护理需求的医疗服务频繁使用者,在初级保健中实施病例管理的混合方法分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):e038241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038241.
3
Case management in primary healthcare for people with complex needs to improve integrated care: a large-scale implementation study protocol.基层医疗中对有复杂需求人群的病例管理以改善整合照护:一项大规模实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 12;14(8):e083783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083783.
4
Case management in primary care among frequent users of healthcare services with chronic conditions: protocol of a realist synthesis.基层医疗中对患有慢性病的高频率医疗服务使用者进行病例管理:一项实际情况综合分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 3;7(9):e017701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017701.
5
Implementation analysis of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: A multiple-case study.实施案例管理干预措施以减少医疗服务频繁使用者的分析:一项多案例研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Apr 1;20(20 Suppl 1):2757. doi: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2757.
6
Implementation analysis of a case management intervention for people with complex care needs in primary care: a multiple case study across Canada.实施分析案例管理干预复杂的照顾需求的人在初级保健:一个多案例研究在加拿大各地。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 19;23(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09379-7.
7
Partners for the optimal organisation of the healthcare continuum for high users of health and social services: protocol of a developmental evaluation case study design.针对健康和社会服务高需求者优化医疗保健连续体组织的合作伙伴:一项发展性评估案例研究设计方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 2;4(12):e006991. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006991.
8
Integrating care for frequent users of emergency departments: implementation evaluation of a brief multi-organizational intensive case management intervention.整合急诊科频繁使用者的护理:一项简短的多组织强化病例管理干预措施的实施评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 27;16:156. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1407-5.
9
Implementation of the BETTER 2 program: a qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators of a novel way to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care.BETTER 2项目的实施:一项定性研究,探索改善初级保健中慢性病预防和筛查新方法的障碍与促进因素。
Implement Sci. 2016 Dec 1;11(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0525-0.
10
Identifying organisational principles and management practices important to the quality of health care services for chronic conditions.确定对慢性病医疗服务质量至关重要的组织原则和管理实践。
Dan Med J. 2012 Feb;59(2):B4387.

引用本文的文献

1
Citizen science for research in public health: perspective.用于公共卫生研究的公民科学:视角
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;13:1594293. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594293. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring caregiver perspectives on health service delivery priorities for individuals with complex care needs: a qualitative descriptive study.探索护理人员对有复杂护理需求者的医疗服务提供优先事项的看法:一项质性描述性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):1059. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13249-9.
3
Case management in primary healthcare for people with complex needs to improve integrated care: a large-scale implementation study protocol.基层医疗中对有复杂需求人群的病例管理以改善整合照护:一项大规模实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 12;14(8):e083783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083783.
4
Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model.患者参与健康实施研究:逻辑模型。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1854-1862. doi: 10.1111/hex.13782. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Implementation analysis of a case management intervention for people with complex care needs in primary care: a multiple case study across Canada.实施分析案例管理干预复杂的照顾需求的人在初级保健:一个多案例研究在加拿大各地。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 19;23(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09379-7.
6
Nursing Care Coordination in Primary Healthcare for Patients with Complex Needs: A Comparative Case Study.针对有复杂需求患者的初级医疗保健中的护理协调:一项比较案例研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6729. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
7
Identifying complex patients in family medicine for potential benefit from a case manager: a short questionnaire derived from the INTERMED Self-Assessment (IMSA) questionnaire.家庭医学中识别有潜在获益可能的复杂患者的工具:基于 INTERMED 自我评估(IMSA)问卷开发的短问卷。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 4;23(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01876-8.
8
Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study.患者和研究人员对初级保健医疗研究中患者参与的体验:一项参与式定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2365-2376. doi: 10.1111/hex.13542. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
9
Case Study With a Participatory Approach: Rethinking Pragmatics of Stakeholder Engagement for Implementation Research.案例研究采用参与式方法:重新思考利益相关者参与实施研究的语用学。
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Nov-Dec;19(6):540-546. doi: 10.1370/afm.2717.
10
Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient-oriented questionnaires.协调患者舒适度和理解的有效性与挑战:面向患者的问卷指南。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2147-2154. doi: 10.1111/hex.13373. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services: A Mixed Methods Study.基层医疗保健中经常使用医疗服务人群的病例管理:一项混合方法研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 May;16(3):232-239. doi: 10.1370/afm.2233.
2
Key factors of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a thematic analysis review.针对频繁使用医疗服务者的病例管理干预措施的关键因素:一项主题分析综述
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e017762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017762.
3
Case management in primary care among frequent users of healthcare services with chronic conditions: protocol of a realist synthesis.基层医疗中对患有慢性病的高频率医疗服务使用者进行病例管理:一项实际情况综合分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 3;7(9):e017701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017701.
4
Exploring the utility and scalability of a telehomecare intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis-a study protocol.探索针对接受腹膜透析的慢性肾病患者的远程家庭护理干预措施的效用和可扩展性——一项研究方案
BMC Nephrol. 2017 May 10;18(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0557-y.
5
Individual predictors of frequent emergency department use: a scoping review.频繁使用急诊科的个体预测因素:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 20;16(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1852-1.
6
Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review.针对频繁使用医疗服务者的病例管理干预措施的有效性:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 29;6(9):e012353. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012353.
7
Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale.澳大利亚社区慢性病自我管理的测量:修订版健康伙伴(PIH)量表的因子结构
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jan;26(1):149-159. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1368-5. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations.拉美西斯二世现实主义评价报告标准。
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1.
9
The Effectiveness of Emergency Department Visit Reduction Programs: A Systematic Review.减少急诊科就诊项目的有效性:一项系统评价
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;68(4):467-483.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
10
Promoting development and uptake of health innovations: The Nose to Tail Tool.促进健康创新的发展与应用:从头到尾工具
F1000Res. 2016 Mar 16;5:361. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8145.1. eCollection 2016.