Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;12(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02193-6.
With a high mortality of 12.6% of all cancer cases, colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for substantial burden of disease in Europe. In the past decade, more and more countries have introduced organized colorectal cancer screening programs, making systematic screening available to entire segments of a population, typically based on routine stool tests and/or colonoscopy. While the effectiveness of organized screening in reducing CRC incidence and mortality has been confirmed, studies continuously report persistent program implementation challenges. This systematic review will synthesize the literature on organized CRC screening programs. Its aim is to understand what is currently known about the barriers and facilitators that influence the implementation of these programs and about the implementation strategies used to navigate these determinants.
A systematic review of primary studies of any research design will be conducted. CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus will be searched. Websites of (non-)government health care organizations and websites of organizations affiliated with authors of included studies will be screened for unpublished evaluation reports. Existing organized CRC screening programs will be contacted with a request to share program-specific grey literature. Two researchers will independently screen each publication in two rounds for eligibility. Included studies will focus on adult populations involved in the implementation of organized CRC screening programs and contain information about implementation determinants/ strategies. Publications will be assessed for their risk of bias. Data extraction will include study aim, design, location, setting, sample, methods, and measures; program characteristics; implementation stage, framework, determinants, strategies, and outcomes; and service and other outcome information. Findings will be synthesized narratively using the three stages of thematic synthesis.
With its sole focus on the implementation of organized CRC screening programs, this review will help to fill a central knowledge gap in the literature on colorectal cancer screening. Its findings can inform the decision-making in policy and practice needed to prioritize resources for establishing new and maintaining existing programs in the future.
PROSPERO (CRD42022306580).
结直肠癌(CRC)在所有癌症病例中死亡率高达 12.6%,在欧洲造成了巨大的疾病负担。在过去的十年中,越来越多的国家引入了有组织的结直肠癌筛查计划,使整个人群都能接受系统的筛查,通常基于常规粪便检查和/或结肠镜检查。虽然有组织的筛查在降低 CRC 的发病率和死亡率方面的有效性已得到证实,但研究不断报告存在持续的项目实施挑战。本系统综述将综合有关有组织的 CRC 筛查计划的文献。其目的是了解目前已知的影响这些计划实施的障碍和促进因素,以及用于应对这些决定因素的实施策略。
将对任何研究设计的原始研究进行系统综述。将检索 CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE、国际临床试验注册平台、MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 Scopus。将筛选(非)政府卫生保健组织的网站和纳入研究作者所属组织的网站,以查找未发表的评估报告。将联系现有的有组织的 CRC 筛查计划,请求分享特定于计划的灰色文献。两名研究人员将独立进行两轮筛选,以确定是否符合入选标准。纳入的研究将重点关注参与有组织的 CRC 筛查计划实施的成年人群,并包含有关实施决定因素/策略的信息。将对出版物进行偏倚风险评估。数据提取将包括研究目的、设计、地点、背景、样本、方法和措施;计划特征;实施阶段、框架、决定因素、策略和结果;以及服务和其他结果信息。将使用主题合成的三个阶段对研究结果进行叙述性综合。
本综述仅专注于有组织的 CRC 筛查计划的实施,将有助于填补有关结直肠癌筛查文献中的一个重要知识空白。其研究结果可以为未来为建立新计划和维持现有计划提供决策依据,为政策和实践中的资源分配提供信息。
PROSPERO(CRD42022306580)。