• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[适用于相对文化适应扩展模型的内群体偏见测试:信效度证据]

[In-group Bias Test adapted to the relative acculturation extended model: reliability and validity evidences].

作者信息

Rojas Tejada Antonio José, Navas Luque Marisol, Lozano Rojas Óscar M, Gómez Berrocal Carmen

机构信息

Universidad de Almería, Facultad de Psicología, Almería, Spain.

出版信息

Psicothema. 2010 Nov;22(4):1039-47.

PMID:21044550
Abstract

In-group favouritism has become a variable of enormous importance in the study of inter-ethnic relations. According to current approaches, it can be understood as a tendency among the members of one group to favour or value the behaviour, attitudes, preferences or perceptions of their own group over those of another group to which they do not belong. The aim of this work is to study the psychometric properties of a new test for measuring inter-ethnic in-group bias, in majority (native) and minority (immigrant) groups. The test is based on the acculturation areas of the Relative Acculturation Extended Model (RAEM). Participants were 992 Spaniards and 975 immigrants (500 Romanians and 475 Ecuadorians). The reliability estimate and validity evidence for these samples show that the psychometric properties of the In-group Bias Test are appropriate for use in multi-ethnic contexts, as it can be used in majority (native) and minority (Romanian and Ecuadorian immigrants) groups.

摘要

群体内偏袒已成为族际关系研究中一个极为重要的变量。根据当前的研究方法,它可被理解为一个群体的成员倾向于偏袒或重视自己群体的行为、态度、偏好或认知,而不是他们不属于的另一个群体的这些方面。这项工作的目的是研究一种用于测量族际群体内偏见的新测试在多数群体(本地人)和少数群体(移民)中的心理测量特性。该测试基于相对文化适应扩展模型(RAEM)的文化适应领域。参与者包括992名西班牙人和975名移民(500名罗马尼亚人和475名厄瓜多尔人)。这些样本的信度估计和效度证据表明,群体内偏见测试的心理测量特性适用于多民族背景,因为它可用于多数群体(本地人)和少数群体(罗马尼亚和厄瓜多尔移民)。

相似文献

1
[In-group Bias Test adapted to the relative acculturation extended model: reliability and validity evidences].[适用于相对文化适应扩展模型的内群体偏见测试:信效度证据]
Psicothema. 2010 Nov;22(4):1039-47.
2
Acculturation preference profiles of Spaniards and Romanian immigrants: the role of prejudice and public and private acculturation areas.西班牙人和罗马尼亚移民的文化适应偏好模式:偏见和公共及私人文化适应领域的作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2014 Jul-Aug;154(4):339-51. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.903223.
3
Structural model of acculturation attitudes and related psychosocial variables: empirical evidence in native Spaniards.文化适应态度及相关心理社会变量的结构模型:西班牙本国人的实证证据。
Int J Psychol. 2014 Jun;49(3):175-82. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12017. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
4
[Reliability and validity evidence of the Out-group Threat Perception Scale (OTPS)].[外群体威胁感知量表(OTPS)的信效度证据]
Psicothema. 2012;24(3):477-82.
5
Psychological adaptation of Moroccan and Ecuadorean immigrant adolescents in Spain.西班牙的摩洛哥和厄瓜多尔移民青少年的心理适应。
Int J Psychol. 2012;47(1):28-38. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.569722. Epub 2011 May 23.
6
[Prejudice and attitudes of acculturation: perspectives of autochthonous and immigrants].[文化适应中的偏见与态度:原住民与移民的视角]
Psicothema. 2006 May;18(2):187-93.
7
Health-related quality of life, ethnicity and perceived discrimination among immigrants and natives in Spain.健康相关生活质量、种族以及西班牙移民和本地居民的感知歧视。
Ethn Health. 2014;19(2):178-97. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2013.797569. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Development and validation of a Coping with Discrimination Scale: factor structure, reliability, and validity.应对歧视量表的编制与验证:结构因素、信度和效度。
J Couns Psychol. 2010 Jul;57(3):328-44. doi: 10.1037/a0019969.
9
Ethnic and national identity among second-generation immigrant adolescents in France: the role of social context and family.法国第二代移民青少年的种族和民族认同:社会环境与家庭的作用
J Adolesc. 2008 Apr;31(2):185-205. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
10
Prejudiced attitude measurement using the Rasch Rating Scale model.使用拉施评分量表模型测量偏见态度。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Oct;109(2):553-72. doi: 10.2466/07.17.PR0.109.5.553-572.