• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药学专业本硕连读学生的学习方法。

Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in undergraduate and graduate entry programs.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Aug 10;74(6):106. doi: 10.5688/aj7406106.

DOI:10.5688/aj7406106
PMID:21045948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2933015/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare longitudinal data with previous cross-sectional data regarding Australian undergraduate pharmacy students' approaches to learning, and explore the differences in approaches to learning between undergraduate and postgraduate cohorts.

METHODS

Longitudinal, repeated measures design using a validated self-report survey instrument were used to gather data.

RESULTS

Undergraduate students' preferences for meaning directed, undirected, and reproduction-directed approaches to learning displayed the same pattern across the 2 studies; however, application-directed scores increased significantly in the second half of the undergraduate degree program. Commencing postgraduate students' approaches to learning were similar to finishing undergraduate students, and this group was significantly more oriented towards meaning-directed learning compared to undergraduate students.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacy students' maturation in approach to their learning was evident and this bodes well for pharmacists' engaging in life-long learning and capacity to work in increasingly complex health settings.

摘要

目的

比较澳大利亚本科生药学学生学习方法的纵向数据与之前的横断面数据,并探讨本科和研究生群体学习方法的差异。

方法

使用经过验证的自我报告调查工具进行纵向、重复测量设计来收集数据。

结果

在这两项研究中,本科生对有意义导向、无导向和再现导向的学习方法的偏好呈现出相同的模式;然而,在本科课程的后半段,应用导向的分数显著增加。开始研究生学习的学生的学习方法与完成本科学习的学生相似,与本科生相比,这一组学生更倾向于有意义导向的学习。

结论

药学学生在学习方法上的成熟度显而易见,这对药剂师从事终身学习和在日益复杂的医疗环境中工作的能力是有利的。

相似文献

1
Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in undergraduate and graduate entry programs.药学专业本硕连读学生的学习方法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Aug 10;74(6):106. doi: 10.5688/aj7406106.
2
Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in an Australian university.澳大利亚一所大学药学专业学生的学习方法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Dec 15;71(6):120. doi: 10.5688/aj7106120.
3
Undergraduate pharmacy students' perceptions of research in general and attitudes towards pharmacy practice research.本科药学专业学生对一般研究的看法以及对药学实践研究的态度。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Jun;21(3):192-201. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00241.x. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
4
Participants' perceptions of a multidisciplinary training program for graduate and postgraduate students in drug use management and policy.参与者对药物使用管理和政策研究生和博士生多学科培训项目的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Jun 12;77(5):102. doi: 10.5688/ajpe775102.
5
A graduate student mentoring program to develop interest in research.研究生指导计划以培养对研究的兴趣。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Aug 10;76(6):104. doi: 10.5688/ajpe766104.
6
Concept mapping to evaluate an undergraduate pharmacy curriculum.概念图评估本科药学课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Apr 11;75(3):55. doi: 10.5688/ajpe75355.
7
Evaluating the effectiveness of a peer-led education intervention to improve the patient safety attitudes of junior pharmacy students: a cross-sectional study using a latent growth curve modelling approach.评估同伴主导的教育干预对提高药学专业低年级学生患者安全态度的有效性:一项采用潜在增长曲线建模方法的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 8;5(12):e010045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010045.
8
Syrian pharmacy students' intentions and attitudes toward postgraduate education.叙利亚药学专业学生对研究生教育的意向和态度。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Oct 12;76(8):147. doi: 10.5688/ajpe768147.
9
An Initial Validation Study of the Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning for Pharmacy Education.《药学教育自主学习自评量表的初步验证研究》
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Apr;82(3):6251. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6251.
10
A Thematic Analysis of Pharmacy Students' Experiences of the Undergraduate Pharmacy Degree in Ireland and the Role of Mindfulness.爱尔兰药学专业本科生的经历与正念的主题分析
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Feb;83(1):6457. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6457.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Prepharmacy Program on Students' Self-Awareness of Pharmacist Professional Identity: Comparison between Virtual and In-Person Settings.药学预科项目对学生药剂师职业身份自我认知的影响:虚拟与面对面环境的比较
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Apr 9;10(2):44. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10020044.
2
Longitudinal Changes of Deep and Surface Learning in a Constructivist Pharmacy Curriculum.建构主义药学课程中深度学习和表面学习的纵向变化
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Oct 26;8(4):200. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8040200.
3
Measuring Metacognitive Knowledge, Monitoring, and Control in the Pharmacy Classroom and Experiential Settings.测量药学课堂和实践环境中的元认知知识、监控和控制。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 May;84(5):7730. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7730.
4
Rethinking Competence: A Nexus of Educational Models in the Context of Lifelong Learning.重新思考能力:终身学习背景下教育模式的关联
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 May 8;8(2):81. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8020081.
5
Factors Associated with Student Pharmacists' Academic Progression and Performance on the National Licensure Examination.与学生药剂师学业进步和国家执照考试表现相关的因素。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Feb;84(2):7561. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7561.
6
Effect of Metacognitive Prompts on Undergraduate Pharmacy Students' Self-regulated Learning Behavior.元认知提示对本科药学学生自主学习行为的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 May;83(4):6646. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6646.
7
Evaluating the effectiveness of a peer-led education intervention to improve the patient safety attitudes of junior pharmacy students: a cross-sectional study using a latent growth curve modelling approach.评估同伴主导的教育干预对提高药学专业低年级学生患者安全态度的有效性:一项采用潜在增长曲线建模方法的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 8;5(12):e010045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010045.
8
Validation of a survey tool to assess the patient safety attitudes of pharmacy students.一种用于评估药学专业学生患者安全态度的调查工具的验证
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 10;5(9):e008442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008442.
9
Comparing effectiveness of high-fidelity human patient simulation vs case-based learning in pharmacy education.比较高保真模拟患者与基于案例的学习在药学教育中的有效性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Oct 15;78(8):153. doi: 10.5688/ajpe788153.
10
An international validation study of two achievement goal measures in a pharmacy education context.在药学教育背景下对两种成就目标测量方法的国际验证研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014 Sep 27;5:339-45. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S68241. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of critical thinking in pharmacy students.评估药学专业学生的批判性思维能力。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Jul 10;73(4):66. doi: 10.5688/aj730466.
2
Best practices assessment to guide curricular change in a bachelor of pharmacy program.指导药学学士学位课程变革的最佳实践评估
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Feb 19;73(1):12. doi: 10.5688/aj730112.
3
Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in an Australian university.澳大利亚一所大学药学专业学生的学习方法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Dec 15;71(6):120. doi: 10.5688/aj7106120.
4
Pharmacy education in the context of Australian practice.澳大利亚实践背景下的药学教育。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Dec 15;72(6):131. doi: 10.5688/aj7206131.
5
Preparing for a Renaissance in pharmacy education: the need, opportunity, and capacity for change.为药学教育的复兴做准备:变革的必要性、机遇和能力。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Apr 15;72(2):42. doi: 10.5688/aj720242.
6
Integrating family medicine and pharmacy to advance primary care therapeutics.整合家庭医学与药学以推进基层医疗治疗学发展。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jun;83(6):913-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.29. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
7
Learning outcomes and program-level evaluation in a four-year undergraduate pharmacy curriculum.四年制本科药学课程的学习成果与课程层面评估
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Oct 15;71(5):90. doi: 10.5688/aj710590.
8
Sensitivity of patient outcomes to pharmacist interventions. Part II: Systematic review and meta-analysis in hypertension management.患者预后对药剂师干预措施的敏感性。第二部分:高血压管理中的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Nov;41(11):1770-81. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K311. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
9
Sensitivity of patient outcomes to pharmacist interventions. Part I: systematic review and meta-analysis in diabetes management.患者结局对药剂师干预措施的敏感性。第一部分:糖尿病管理中的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Oct;41(10):1569-82. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K151. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
10
Believing what we know: pharmacy provides value.相信我们所了解的:药学具有价值。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jun;64(12):1284-91. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070015.