Townley W A, Nguyen D Q A, Rooker J C, Dickson J K, Goroszeniuk D Z, Khan M S, Camp D
Odstock Centre for Burns, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury SP2 8BJ, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Nov;92(8):693-6. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12699663904592.
The treatment of soft-tissue injuries associated with tibial diaphyseal fractures presents a clinical challenge that is best managed by a combined plastic and orthopaedic surgery approach. The current study was undertaken to assess early treatment outcomes and burden of service provision across five regional plastic surgery units in the South-West of England.
We conducted a prospective 6-month audit of open tibial diaphyseal fracture management in five plastic surgery units (Bristol, Exeter, Plymouth, Salisbury, Swansea) with a collective catchment of 9.2 million people. Detailed data were collected on patient demographics, injury pattern, surgical management and outcome followed to discharge.
The study group consisted of 55 patients (40 male, 15 female). Twenty-two patients presented directly to the emergency department at the specialist hospital (primary group), 33 patients were initially managed at a local hospital (tertiary group). The mean time from injury to soft tissue cover was significantly less (P < 0.001) in the primary group (3.6 ± 0.8 days) than the tertiary group (10.8 ± 2.2 days), principally due to a delay in referral in the latter group (5.4 ± 1.7 days). Cover was achieved with 39 flaps (19 free, 20 local), eight split skin grafts. Nine wounds closed directly or by secondary intention. There were 11 early complications (20%) including one flap failure and four infections. The overall mean length of stay was 17.5 ± 2.8 days.
Multidisciplinary management of severe open tibial diaphyseal may not be feasible at presentation of injury depending on local hospital specialist services available. Our results highlight the need for robust assessment, triage and senior orthopaedic review in the early post-injury phase. However, broader improvements in the management of lower limb trauma will additionally require further development of combined specialist trauma centres.
与胫骨干骨折相关的软组织损伤的治疗是一项临床挑战,采用整形与矫形外科联合手术方法进行处理最为理想。本研究旨在评估英格兰西南部五个地区整形外科单位的早期治疗效果及服务负担。
我们对五个整形外科单位(布里斯托尔、埃克塞特、普利茅斯、索尔兹伯里、斯旺西)的开放性胫骨干骨折治疗进行了为期6个月的前瞻性审计,这些单位的总服务人口为920万。收集了患者人口统计学、损伤模式、手术治疗及出院时的治疗结果等详细数据。
研究组包括55例患者(40例男性,15例女性)。22例患者直接到专科医院急诊科就诊(原发组),33例患者最初在当地医院接受治疗(三级组)。原发组从受伤到软组织覆盖的平均时间(3.6±0.8天)显著短于三级组(10.8±2.2天)(P<0.001),主要原因是后者转诊延迟(5.4±1.7天)。采用了39块皮瓣(19块游离皮瓣,20块局部皮瓣)、8块断层皮片移植。9处伤口直接愈合或二期愈合。有11例早期并发症(20%),包括1例皮瓣坏死和4例感染。总体平均住院时间为17.5±2.8天。
根据当地可获得的医院专科服务情况,严重开放性胫骨干骨折的多学科管理在受伤时可能不可行。我们的结果强调在伤后早期需要进行全面评估、分诊和高级矫形外科会诊。然而,要更广泛地改善下肢创伤的管理,还需要进一步发展联合专科创伤中心。