Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010 Sep;81(3 Suppl):S75-8. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2010.10599696.
When institutional testing is done well, there are many potential benefits; however, it is not without its negatives. The TYEP is an example of large scale institutional testing that yielded more than a few benefits as described in this supplement. However, results reported some problems as well. We have learned much from the TYEP, including what works and what does not when conducting large-scale fitness testing projects. Questions that need answers include: (a) How often must similar testing be done to achieve the intended goals? (b) Can alternative forms of testing be used to meet our goals? (c) How can we improve the next institutional testing to accentuate the positives and diminish the negatives? (d) How do we acquire the necessary funding and adequate teacher support for future institutional testing? and (e) How can we best obtain the necessary funding and support for quality physical education, including already approved but unfunded mandates? Support for quality physical education is necessary if we are to increase youth activity levels, improve youth fitness, and help reduce the risk for childhood obesity-all important goals of the TYEP.
当机构测试做得好时,它有许多潜在的好处;然而,它并非没有缺点。TYEP 是大规模机构测试的一个例子,正如本增刊所述,它带来了不止一些好处。然而,报告的结果也存在一些问题。我们从 TYEP 中学到了很多,包括在进行大规模健身测试项目时,什么是有效的,什么是无效的。需要回答的问题包括:(a) 要达到预期目标,需要多久进行一次类似的测试?(b) 是否可以使用其他形式的测试来达到我们的目标?(c) 我们如何改进下一次机构测试,以突出其积极面并减少其消极面?(d) 我们如何为未来的机构测试获得必要的资金和足够的教师支持?以及 (e) 我们如何才能最好地为包括已批准但未获得资金的指令在内的优质体育教育获得必要的资金和支持?如果我们要提高青少年的活动水平,提高青少年的健康水平,并帮助减少儿童肥胖的风险——所有这些都是 TYEP 的重要目标——那么支持优质体育教育是必要的。