Department of Neuroscience, Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11(9):1203-14. doi: 10.2174/156802611795371314.
Benzodiazepine site agonists (such as diazepam) are well-known to impair cognition. Since benzodiazepines exert their effects via modulation of α1-, α2-, α3- and α5-containing GABA(A) receptors, the cognition-impairing effects of diazepam must be associated with one or several of these subtypes. Of these different subtypes, α5-containing GABA(A) receptors represent an attractive option as the "cognition" subtype based upon the preferential localization of these receptors within the hippocampus and the well-established role of the hippocampus in learning and memory. As a result, it is hypothesized that an inverse agonist selective for the α5 subtype should enhance cognition. For example, L-655708, a partial inverse agonist with 50-100-fold higher affinity for the α5 relative to the α1, α2 and α3 subtypes of GABA(A) receptors, enhanced cognitive performance in rats. Unfortunately, however, pharmacokinetic properties of this compound prevented it being developed further. In order to try achieve binding selectivity in a series structurally distinct from the imidazobenzodiazepines, the group at Merck, Sharp & Dohme commenced studies within the triazolopyridazine series. Although a degree of binding selectivity could be achieved (a maximum of 22-125-fold for α5 versus α1, α2 or α3) this approach was dropped in favour of a strategy to identify compounds with either a combination of selective affinity and selective efficacy or purely selective efficacy. With respect to the former, screening of the Merck chemical collection identified a novel, moderately α5-binding selective thiophene series and further optimization of this series produced MRK-536, which demonstrated a modest α5 binding selectivity (~10-fold) as well as α5-efficacy selectivity. However, the structure-activity relationship within this and the analogous tetralone series proved unpredictable and these series were not pursued further. The success of the selective efficacy approach on the α2/α3-selective agonist project led a similar paradigm being adopted for the α5 project. The starting point for this strategy was the triazolopyridazine 3 which, like MRK-536, possessed a degree of both α5 binding- and efficacy-selectivity. By changing the core from a triazolopyridazine to a triazolophthalazine structure, α5 binding selectivity was lost but with subsequent optimization, compounds with the desired profile (low or antagonist efficacy at the α1, α2 and α3 subtypes and marked inverse agonism at α5-containing receptors) could be achieved, allowing the clinical candidate α5IA as well as the structurally-related pharmacological tool compound α5IA-II to be identified. By appending features of the prototypic α2/α3-selective triazolopyridazine L-838417 (t-butyl and 1,2,4 triazole) along with the isoxazole of α5IA to a pyrazolotriazine core, an additional clinical candidate, MRK-016, was identified. Finally, a degree of α5 efficacy selectivity was achieved the pyridazine series but metabolic instability within this chemotype limited its further optimization. Overall, these studies demonstrate the feasibility of adopting a selective efficacy approach in the identification of α5 selective GABA(A) receptor inverse agonists.
苯二氮䓬类药物位点激动剂(如地西泮)众所周知会损害认知。由于苯二氮䓬类药物通过调节包含 α1、α2、α3 和 α5 的 GABA(A) 受体发挥作用,因此地西泮的认知损害作用必须与这些亚型之一或几个有关。在这些不同的亚型中,含有 α5 的 GABA(A) 受体是一种有吸引力的选择,因为这些受体在海马体中的优先定位以及海马体在学习和记忆中的既定作用,使其成为“认知”亚型。因此,假设对 α5 亚型具有反向激动剂选择性的化合物应该增强认知。例如,L-655708 是一种部分反向激动剂,对 GABA(A) 受体的 α5 亚型的亲和力比 α1、α2 和 α3 亚型高 50-100 倍,它增强了大鼠的认知表现。然而,不幸的是,该化合物的药代动力学特性阻止了它的进一步开发。为了在与咪唑并苯二氮䓬结构上明显不同的一系列化合物中实现结合选择性,默克公司的研究人员开始在三唑并吡啶嗪系列中进行研究。尽管可以达到一定程度的结合选择性(对 α5 的最大结合选择性为 22-125 倍,对 α1、α2 或 α3),但该方法被放弃,转而采用识别具有选择性亲和力和选择性效力或纯选择性效力的化合物的策略。关于前者,默克化学收藏的筛选确定了一种新型的、中等程度的 α5 结合选择性噻吩系列,进一步优化该系列产生了 MRK-536,其表现出适度的 α5 结合选择性(~10 倍)和 α5 效力选择性。然而,该和类似的四氢酮系列中的结构-活性关系不可预测,因此没有进一步研究这些系列。在 α2/α3 选择性激动剂项目中选择性效力方法的成功导致在 α5 项目中采用类似的方法。该策略的起点是具有一定程度的 α5 结合和效力选择性的三唑并吡啶嗪 3。通过将核心从三唑并吡啶嗪改为三唑并酞嗪结构,α5 结合选择性丧失,但通过随后的优化,可以实现具有所需特征的化合物(在 α1、α2 和 α3 亚型中具有低或拮抗剂效力,在包含 α5 的受体中具有明显的反向激动作用),从而可以确定临床候选药物 α5IA 以及结构相关的药理学工具化合物 α5IA-II。通过将原型 α2/α3 选择性三唑并吡啶嗪 L-838417 的特征(叔丁基和 1,2,4 三唑)与 α5IA 的异噁唑一起附加到吡唑并三嗪核心上,确定了另一个临床候选药物 MRK-016。最后,在吡嗪系列中实现了一定程度的 α5 效力选择性,但该化学型的代谢不稳定性限制了其进一步优化。总体而言,这些研究表明,在识别 α5 选择性 GABA(A) 受体反向激动剂时,采用选择性效力方法是可行的。