• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于患者既往曲坦类药物反应的替拉那肽的抗偏头痛疗效。

Antimigraine efficacy of telcagepant based on patient's historical triptan response.

机构信息

Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA 19454-1099, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 2011 Jan;51(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01790.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01790.x
PMID:21054362
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the same or different patients respond to triptans and telcagepant.

BACKGROUND

Telcagepant is an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist with acute antimigraine efficacy comparable to oral triptans. It is currently unknown whether migraine patients who cannot be adequately helped with triptans might benefit from treatment with telcagepant.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of data from a randomized, controlled trial of telcagepant (150 mg, 300 mg) zolmitriptan 5 mg, or placebo for a moderate/severe migraine. Responder rates were analyzed according to patients' self-reported historical triptan response (HTR): (1) good HTR (N = 660): response in 75-100% of attacks; (2) intermediate HTR (N = 248): response in 25-74% of attacks; (3) poor HTR/no use (N = 407): response in < 25% of attacks, or patient did not take triptans. A limitation of the analysis is that the last subgroup comprised mainly (91%) patients who reported that they did not take triptans, but it was not known whether these patients were triptan-naïve or had previously used triptans and stopped taking them.

RESULTS

For zolmitriptan, 2-hour pain relief rates were higher in the good HTR subgroup (116/162, 72%) than in the intermediate (29/62, 47%) and poor/no use (44/111, 40%) HTR subgroups. The 2-hour pain relief rates were similar across HTR subgroups for telcagepant 150 mg (48-58%), 300 mg (52-58%), and placebo (26-31%). In the poor/no use HTR subgroup, more patients receiving telcagepant 300 mg (56/98, 57.1%) had 2-hour pain relief than those receiving zolmitriptan (44/111, 39.6%; odds ratio = 2.11 [95% CI: 1.20,3.71], P = .009); the percentage for telcagepant 150 mg (57/119, 47.9%) was not significantly different from zolmitriptan (odds ratio = 1.41 [95% CI: 0.82, 2.40], P = .211).

CONCLUSIONS

This suggests that different patients may respond to triptans or telcagepant 300 mg. Caution should be exercised in interpreting the results because of the post-hoc nature of the analysis (clinical trial registry: NCT00442936).

摘要

目的

评估相同或不同的患者对曲普坦类药物和替拉那班的反应。

背景

替拉那班是一种口服降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂,其急性抗偏头痛疗效与口服曲普坦类药物相当。目前尚不清楚不能充分受益于曲普坦类药物治疗的偏头痛患者是否可能从替拉那班治疗中获益。

方法

替拉那班(150mg、300mg)、佐米曲普坦 5mg 或安慰剂治疗中度/重度偏头痛的随机对照试验的事后分析。根据患者自我报告的曲普坦类药物既往反应(HTR),分析应答率:(1)良好 HTR(N=660):反应率为 75-100%;(2)中等 HTR(N=248):反应率为 25-74%;(3)差 HTR/未使用(N=407):反应率<25%,或患者未服用曲普坦类药物。该分析的一个局限性是,最后一个亚组主要包括(91%)报告未服用曲普坦类药物的患者,但尚不清楚这些患者是否为曲普坦类药物初治患者,或是否曾使用过曲普坦类药物但已停止使用。

结果

佐米曲普坦组 2 小时疼痛缓解率在良好 HTR 亚组(116/162,72%)高于中等 HTR(29/62,47%)和差/未使用 HTR(44/111,40%)亚组。替拉那班 150mg、300mg 和安慰剂组的 2 小时疼痛缓解率在 HTR 亚组之间相似(48-58%)。在差/未使用 HTR 亚组中,接受替拉那班 300mg 治疗的患者(56/98,57.1%)比接受佐米曲普坦治疗的患者(44/111,39.6%;优势比=2.11[95%CI:1.20,3.71],P=0.009)的 2 小时疼痛缓解率更高;替拉那班 150mg 组(57/119,47.9%)与佐米曲普坦组的比例无显著差异(优势比=1.41[95%CI:0.82,2.40],P=0.211)。

结论

这表明不同的患者可能对曲普坦类药物或替拉那班 300mg 有反应。由于分析的事后性质(临床试验注册:NCT00442936),应谨慎解释结果。

相似文献

1
Antimigraine efficacy of telcagepant based on patient's historical triptan response.基于患者既往曲坦类药物反应的替拉那肽的抗偏头痛疗效。
Headache. 2011 Jan;51(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01790.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
2
Molecule of the month. Telcagepant.本月分子。替卡格雷泮。
Drug News Perspect. 2009 Mar;22(2):115.
3
Long-term tolerability of telcagepant for acute treatment of migraine in a randomized trial.在一项随机试验中,telcagepant 治疗偏头痛急性发作的长期耐受性。
Headache. 2011 Jan;51(1):73-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01799.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmitriptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trial.降钙素基因相关肽受体新型口服拮抗剂MK-0974(替卡普坦)与佐米曲普坦治疗急性偏头痛的疗效及耐受性比较:一项随机、安慰剂对照、平行治疗试验
Lancet. 2008 Dec 20;372(9656):2115-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-8. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
5
Sustained pain freedom and no adverse events as an endpoint in clinical trials of acute migraine treatments: application to patient-level data from a trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist, telcagepant, and zolmitriptan.在急性偏头痛治疗临床试验中以持续疼痛缓解且无不良事件作为终点:应用于 CGRP 受体拮抗剂(telcagepant)和佐米曲普坦的临床试验的患者水平数据
Cephalalgia. 2011 Feb;31(3):296-300. doi: 10.1177/0333102410385585. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
6
Comparison of the vasoconstrictor effects of the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist telcagepant (MK-0974) and zolmitriptan in human isolated coronary arteries.比较降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂 telcagepant(MK-0974)和佐米曲普坦在人离体冠状动脉中的血管收缩作用。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2010 May;55(5):518-21. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181d7665f.
7
Excellent tolerability but relatively low initial clinical efficacy of telcagepant in migraine.曲坦类药物替拉那肽治疗偏头痛的耐受性良好,但初始临床疗效相对较低。
Headache. 2011 Jan;51(1):118-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01797.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
8
CGRP-receptor antagonism in migraine treatment.偏头痛治疗中的降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)受体拮抗作用。
Lancet. 2008 Dec 20;372(9656):2089-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61710-9. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Telcagepant, a calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist for the treatment of migraine.替卡格雷泮,一种用于治疗偏头痛的降钙素基因相关肽拮抗剂。
Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2009 Jul;10(7):711-20.
10
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of telcagepant in the treatment of acute migraine: a meta-analysis.替卡格雷治疗急性偏头痛的疗效、安全性及耐受性:一项荟萃分析。
Pain Pract. 2015 Feb;15(2):124-31. doi: 10.1111/papr.12158. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Relative frequency, characteristics, and disease burden of patients with migraine unsuitable for triptan treatment: A systematic literature review.不适用于曲坦类药物治疗的偏头痛患者的相对频率、特征及疾病负担:一项系统文献综述
Headache. 2025 Jan;65(1):164-179. doi: 10.1111/head.14854. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
2
Migraine: Calcium Channels and Glia.偏头痛:钙通道与神经胶质细胞。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 7;22(5):2688. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052688.
3
Efficacy of ubrogepant based on prior exposure and response to triptans: A post hoc analysis.依泊格帕坦基于先前暴露和对曲坦类药物反应的疗效:一项事后分析。
Headache. 2021 Mar;61(3):422-429. doi: 10.1111/head.14089. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Unmet Needs in Japanese Patients Who Report Insufficient Efficacy with Triptans for Acute Treatment of Migraine: Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data.对于曲坦类药物急性治疗偏头痛疗效欠佳的日本患者的未满足需求:真实世界数据的回顾性分析
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):415-432. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00223-y. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
5
Evaluation of Patients with Insufficient Efficacy and/or Tolerability to Triptans for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Literature Review.评价曲坦类药物治疗偏头痛急性发作效果不佳和/或不耐受的患者:系统文献回顾。
Adv Ther. 2020 Dec;37(12):4765-4796. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01494-9. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Factors associated with insufficient response to acute treatment of migraine in Japan: analysis of real-world data from the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme.与日本偏头痛急性治疗反应不足相关的因素:来自 Adelphi 偏头痛疾病特定项目的真实世界数据的分析。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01848-4.
7
The need for new acutely acting antimigraine drugs: moving safely outside acute medication overuse.需要新型急性作用抗偏头痛药物:安全地走出急性药物过度使用。
J Headache Pain. 2019 May 16;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1007-y.
8
CGRP and the Trigeminal System in Migraine.降钙素基因相关肽与偏头痛的三叉神经系统。
Headache. 2019 May;59(5):659-681. doi: 10.1111/head.13529. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
9
Migraine, Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome, and Other Gastrointestinal Disorders.偏头痛、周期性呕吐综合征及其他胃肠道疾病。
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;16(4):511-527. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0202-2.
10
Targeted CGRP Small Molecule Antagonists for Acute Migraine Therapy.靶向降钙素基因相关肽小分子拮抗剂用于急性偏头痛治疗。
Neurotherapeutics. 2018 Apr;15(2):304-312. doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-0617-4.