[A review of the types of economic analyses of the health economy].

Great confusion is involved concerning health economics analyses. For example: What is the difference between cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses? Is there a difference between the so-called cost-of-illness analyses? What is a financial analysis? These questions are discussed on the basis of the underlying economic theory and the use of the analyses. In order to avoid terminological confusion, the English terminology is retained. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses are social economical analyses because they are all-embracing as regards what is understood by costs and profits based on the so-called welfare economy where cost-benefit analyses are concerned. The theoretical basis for cost-effectiveness analysis is slightly more obscure. Where both forms of analysis are concerned, no concern is shown for who obtains the profits or who pays the costs, i.e. a cross-sectional perspective. The financial analysis contrasts with this because attention is focussed directly on expenditures and revenues and the accounts responsible for the expenses and which obtain the revenues. The cost-of-illness analysis is a confusing but frequently employed and quoted form of analysis where an attempt is made to calculate the costs of a certain disease or injurious agent (alcohol, tobacco, accidents) for the various parties involved. These are subdivided into direct costs, roughly corresponding to the costs of treatment and indirect costs which include e.g. loss of income resulting from the illness, disability or death. This form of analysis is strongly warned against as the results of analysis may easily be misused frequently with absurd implications.