• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较慢性心力衰竭患者直接身体成分评估方法。

Comparison of direct body composition assessment methods in patients with chronic heart failure.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2010 Nov;16(11):867-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.06.416. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.06.416
PMID:21055650
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined the validity of leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and near-infrared interactance (NIR) to assess body composition in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 140 patients with CHF were enrolled in this cross-sectional study between June 2008 and July 2009. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) served as the reference standard. A priori, desired precision levels were set at ± 3.5% body fat and ± 3.5 kg lean body mass. Mean age was 63, 74% were male, and 90% were Caucasian. BIA- and NIR-ascertained percent body fat and lean body mass were highly correlated to DEXA. Mean differences and limits of agreement for NIR were -0.3% ± 5.1% for percent body fat and 2.9 kg ± 4.3 kg for lean body mass. Mean difference and limits of agreement for BIA percent body fat was 0.8% ± 5.8%. BIA lean body mass showed poor agreement with DEXA because of variable limits of agreement across the range of measurement (Pitman's test P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CHF, both NIR and BIA accurately measure body fat. However, both methods were imprecise. NIR overestimated lean body mass and BIA was not useful to assess this parameter. Further study is required, including examination of the utility of these field methods in serially assessing body composition.

摘要

背景

我们研究了肢体生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和近红外相互作用(NIR)评估慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者身体成分的有效性。

方法和结果

2008 年 6 月至 2009 年 7 月期间,共纳入 140 例 CHF 患者进行横断面研究。双能 X 射线吸收法(DEXA)作为参考标准。根据需要,设定了精度水平为±3.5%体脂和±3.5kg 瘦体重。平均年龄为 63 岁,74%为男性,90%为白种人。BIA 和 NIR 确定的体脂百分比和瘦体重与 DEXA 高度相关。NIR 的平均差异和一致性界限为体脂百分比-0.3%±5.1%,瘦体重 2.9kg±4.3kg。BIA 体脂百分比的平均差异和一致性界限为 0.8%±5.8%。BIA 瘦体重与 DEXA 一致性较差,因为测量范围内的一致性界限不同(Pitman 检验 P<0.0001)。

结论

在 CHF 患者中,NIR 和 BIA 均能准确测量体脂。然而,这两种方法都不精确。NIR 高估了瘦体重,BIA 不能用于评估这一体重参数。需要进一步研究,包括检查这些现场方法在连续评估身体成分中的效用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of direct body composition assessment methods in patients with chronic heart failure.比较慢性心力衰竭患者直接身体成分评估方法。
J Card Fail. 2010 Nov;16(11):867-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.06.416. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
2
Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals.非肥胖和肥胖个体中通过双腿生物电阻抗和双能X线吸收法进行身体成分分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Nov;10(11):1012-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00851.x. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
3
Measuring body composition in chronic heart failure: a comparison of methods.慢性心力衰竭患者身体成分的测量:方法比较
Eur J Heart Fail. 2006 Mar;8(2):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.07.007. Epub 2005 Sep 26.
4
Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis.囊性纤维化成人患者的身体成分评估:双能X线吸收法与皮褶厚度测量法及生物电阻抗分析法的比较
Nutrition. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(11-12):1087-94. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2005.04.005. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
5
[A comparative study of a bioelectrical impedance method and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition analysis].生物电阻抗法与双能X线吸收法用于身体成分分析的比较研究
Rinsho Byori. 1994 Oct;42(10):1088-92.
6
A validation study of body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative Hispanic men and women.通过生物电阻抗分析对人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阳性和HIV阴性西班牙裔男性及女性身体成分进行的验证研究。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Mar;108(3):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.12.003.
7
Measurement of body composition in chronic renal failure: comparison of skinfold anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.慢性肾衰竭患者身体成分的测量:皮褶厚度人体测量法和生物电阻抗法与双能X线吸收法的比较
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 May;50(5):295-301.
8
Bioelectrical impedance and strength measurements in patients with heart failure: comparison with functional class.心力衰竭患者的生物电阻抗和力量测量:与心功能分级的比较。
Nutrition. 2007 May;23(5):412-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2007.02.005.
9
Accuracy of eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition in peritoneal dialysis patients.八极生物电阻抗分析评估腹膜透析患者总体和附属身体成分的准确性。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Aug;59(8):932-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602165.
10
Cachexia assessed by bioimpedance vector analysis as a prognostic indicator in chronic stable heart failure patients.生物电阻抗向量分析评估恶病质作为慢性稳定型心力衰竭患者的预后指标。
Nutrition. 2012 Sep;28(9):886-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.11.024. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a cardiac rehabilitation program on biomechanical, imaging, and physiological biomarkers in elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): FUNNEL + study protocol.一项针对射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)老年患者的心脏康复计划对生物力学、影像学和生理学生物标志物的有效性:FUNNEL+ 研究方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03555-7.
2
Impact of the Obesity Paradox Between Sexes on In-Hospital Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.性别间肥胖悖论对心源性休克患者院内死亡率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e024143. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024143. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
3
Paradoxical Obesity and Overweight Disparities Among Sexual Minority Men: A Meta-Analysis.
性少数群体男性中反常性肥胖和超重的差异:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;16(2):15579883221095387. doi: 10.1177/15579883221095387.
4
A comparison of non-invasive methods of measuring body composition in patients with heart failure: a report from SICA-HF.心力衰竭患者身体成分无创测量方法的比较:SICA-HF 的报告。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3929-3934. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13402. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
5
Re-appraisal of the obesity paradox in heart failure: a meta-analysis of individual data.重新评估心力衰竭中的肥胖悖论:个体数据分析的荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Aug;110(8):1280-1291. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01822-1. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
6
Impact of Cardiorespiratory Fitness on the Obesity Paradox in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.心肺适能对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者肥胖悖论的影响
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020 Oct;115(4):639-645. doi: 10.36660/abc.20190337.
7
Does the Energy Restriction Intermittent Fasting Diet Alleviate Metabolic Syndrome Biomarkers? A Randomized Controlled Trial.能量限制间歇性禁食饮食是否能缓解代谢综合征生物标志物?一项随机对照试验。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 21;12(10):3213. doi: 10.3390/nu12103213.
8
Estimating fat mass in heart failure patients.评估心力衰竭患者的脂肪量。
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2016 Aug 16;1(1):e78-e89. doi: 10.5114/amsad.2016.61788. eCollection 2016.
9
The Obesity Paradox in Kidney Disease: How to Reconcile it with Obesity Management.肾病中的肥胖悖论:如何将其与肥胖管理相协调。
Kidney Int Rep. 2017 Mar;2(2):271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Obesity paradox in heart failure: a heavy matter.心力衰竭中的肥胖悖论:一个重要问题。
ESC Heart Fail. 2016 Dec;3(4):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12120. Epub 2016 Oct 31.