Department of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai, China.
J Hepatol. 2011 Feb;54(2):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.032. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In 1999, the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) revised the diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). It subsequently developed the simplified criteria in 2008 to enhance clinical applicability and practicability. In this study, we validated the simplified diagnostic criteria in Chinese patients with AIH or other chronic liver diseases in comparison with the revised original criteria.
Diagnostic scores were determined using the revised original criteria and the simplified criteria in 405 patients with diverse liver diseases. The sample included 127 patients with AIH type I diagnosed by the descriptive criteria, 77 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), 6 patients with AIH-PBC overlap syndrome, 47 patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), 36 patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), 82 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), and 30 patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The simplified criteria were compared to the revised original criteria based on sensitivity, specificity, and predictability for the pre-treatment diagnosis of AIH.
The simplified criteria had sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 95%, respectively, for the diagnosis of probable AIH in the Chinese patients. This compares well with the more rigorous revised original criteria, which had sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 93%, respectively, for probable AIH. On definite AIH, the simplified criteria had sensitivity and specificity of 62% and 99%, respectively, compared to 64% and 100% for definite AIH by the revised original criteria. In addition, the predictabilities of the revised original criteria and simplified criteria were 96% and 94% for probable AIH, and 88% and 87% for definite AIH, respectively, in our groups. Using the revised original criteria, 84 patients were diagnosed with definite AIH. On the other hand, among these 84 patients, the simplified criteria diagnosed only 61 patients with definite AIH (accordant diagnosis) and provided the 23 other patients with downgraded diagnosis. Comparison of the clinical and laboratory features of these two groups (accordant diagnosis vs. downgraded/excluded diagnosis) showed that the patients with downgraded diagnosis had significantly higher histological scores than the patients with accordant diagnosis.
The simplified criteria are comparable to the revised original criteria and have high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of AIH in Chinese patients. Liver histology is critical for the diagnosis of AIH especially when using the simplified criteria. Further study or prospective evaluation is needed to confirm these observations, however, due to the small group of CHC patients as well as the absence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients in our study.
1999 年,国际自身免疫性肝炎小组(IAIHG)修订了自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)的诊断标准。随后,为了提高临床适用性和实用性,于 2008 年制定了简化标准。本研究通过与修订后的原始标准比较,验证了简化标准在中国 AIH 或其他慢性肝病患者中的诊断价值。
使用修订后的原始标准和简化标准对 405 例不同肝病患者的诊断评分进行了测定。该样本包括 127 例经描述性标准诊断为 AIH Ⅰ型的患者、77 例原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)患者、6 例 AIH-PBC 重叠综合征患者、47 例药物性肝损伤(DILI)患者、36 例非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)患者、82 例慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者和 30 例慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者。根据治疗前 AIH 的诊断,比较简化标准与修订后的原始标准的敏感性、特异性和可预测性。
简化标准对中国患者疑似 AIH 的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为 90%和 95%,与更严格的修订后原始标准相当,修订后原始标准对疑似 AIH 的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 93%。对于明确的 AIH,简化标准的敏感性和特异性分别为 62%和 99%,而修订后的原始标准分别为 64%和 100%。此外,修订后的原始标准和简化标准对疑似 AIH 的预测率分别为 96%和 94%,对明确 AIH 的预测率分别为 88%和 87%。根据修订后的原始标准,84 例患者被诊断为明确的 AIH。另一方面,在这 84 例患者中,简化标准仅诊断出 61 例明确的 AIH(符合诊断),并对其他 23 例患者进行了降级诊断。对这两组患者(符合诊断与降级/排除诊断)的临床和实验室特征进行比较后发现,降级诊断组的患者组织学评分明显高于符合诊断组。
简化标准与修订后的原始标准相当,对中国患者 AIH 的诊断具有较高的敏感性和特异性。肝组织学对 AIH 的诊断至关重要,特别是在使用简化标准时。然而,由于本研究 CHC 患者数量较少,以及缺乏原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)患者,需要进一步的研究或前瞻性评估来证实这些观察结果。