Department of Urology, RWTH University Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.039. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to present a summary of the 2010 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised cancer of the prostate (PCa). METHODS: The working panel performed a literature review of the new data emerging from 2007 to 2010. The guidelines were updated, and level of evidence and grade of recommendation were added to the text based on a systematic review of the literature, which included a search of online databases and bibliographic reviews. RESULTS: A full version is available at the EAU office or Web site (www.uroweb.org). Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population-based screening by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for PCa. A systematic prostate biopsy under ultrasound guidance and local anaesthesia is the preferred diagnostic method. Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy. PSA doubling time in <3 yr or a biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention. In men with locally advanced PCa in whom local therapy is not mandatory, watchful waiting (WW) is a treatment alternative to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with equivalent oncologic efficacy. Active treatment is mostly recommended for patients with localised disease and a long life expectancy with radical prostatectomy (RP) shown to be superior to WW in a prospective randomised trial. Nerve-sparing RP represents the approach of choice in organ-confined disease; neoadjuvant androgen deprivation demonstrates no improvement of outcome variables. Radiation therapy should be performed with at least 74 Gy and 78 Gy in low-risk and intermediate/high-risk PCa, respectively. For locally advanced disease, adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior disease-specific and overall survival rates and represents the treatment of choice. Follow-up after local therapy is largely based on PSA, and a disease-specific history with imaging is indicated only when symptoms occur. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge in the field of PCa is rapidly changing. These EAU guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and put them into clinical practice.
目的:本文旨在总结 2010 年版欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)关于局限性前列腺癌(PCa)筛查、诊断和治疗的指南。
方法:工作组对 2007 年至 2010 年新出现的资料进行了文献回顾。根据文献的系统评价,对指南进行了更新,并在文本中添加了证据水平和推荐等级,其中包括在线数据库和文献综述的搜索。
结果:完整版本可在 EAU 办公室或网站(www.uroweb.org)上获得。目前的证据不足以支持通过前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)对 PCa 进行广泛的人群筛查。在超声引导和局部麻醉下进行系统前列腺活检是首选的诊断方法。在低危 PCa 且预期寿命较长的男性中,主动监测是一种可行的选择。PSA 倍增时间<3 年或活检进展表明需要积极干预。对于局部晚期 PCa 患者,如果不要求局部治疗,观察等待(WW)是一种替代雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)的治疗选择,其在肿瘤学疗效方面与 ADT 相当。对于局部疾病和预期寿命较长的患者,大多推荐进行积极治疗,与 WW 相比,前瞻性随机试验显示根治性前列腺切除术(RP)具有优势。对于局限于器官的疾病,神经保留 RP 是首选方法;新辅助雄激素剥夺没有改善结局变量。对于低危和中/高危 PCa,放疗应分别使用至少 74 Gy 和 78 Gy。对于局部晚期疾病,辅助 ADT 3 年可提高疾病特异性和总体生存率,是治疗的首选。局部治疗后随访主要基于 PSA,仅在出现症状时才需要进行疾病特异性病史和影像学检查。
结论:PCa 领域的知识正在迅速变化。这些关于 PCa 的 EAU 指南总结了最近的发现,并将其纳入临床实践。
Eur Urol. 2008-1
Actas Urol Esp. 2009-2
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-5-14
Cureus. 2024-10-31
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024-4-16