Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;12(5):e211-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181fe3193.
To explore similarities and differences in perceptions on pediatric intensive care practices between parents and staff by using data from two studies.
A two-round Delphi method among nurses and physicians followed by an empiric survey among parents.
Pediatric intensive care units at eight university medical centers.
Parents whose child has been admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit, nurses, and physicians.
None.
Outcome measures were 74 satisfaction-with-care items divided into five domains: 1) information; 2) care and cure; 3) organization; 4) parental participation; and 5) professional attitude. The Delphi study was completed by 218 nurses and 46 physicians and the survey by 559 of 1042 (54%) parents. Parents rated 31 items more important than the professionals based on the standardized mean difference (Cohen's d, 0.21-1.18, p < .003). Ten of these were related to information provision. Information on the effects of medication had the largest effect size (Cohen's d 1.18, p = .001). Correct medication administration by professionals was also rated significantly more important by parents (Cohen's d 0.64, p = .001). The professionals rated 12 items more important than the parents (Cohen's d -0.23 to -0.73, p < .005), including three about multicultural care. Significant differences remained on two of the three multicultural care items when the Dutch (n = 483) and non-Dutch parents (n = 76) were separately compared with professionals. On the domain level, parents rated the domains information and parental participation more important than the professionals (Cohen's d 0.36 and 0.26, p = .001).
Compared with the parents' perceptions, nurses and physicians undervalued a substantial number of pediatric intensive care unit care items. This finding may reflect a gap in the understanding of parental experiences as well as incongruity in recognizing the needs of parents.
通过两项研究的数据,探索父母和医护人员对儿科重症监护实践的看法的异同。
对护士和医生进行两轮 Delphi 法研究,然后对父母进行实证调查。
八所大学医学中心的儿科重症监护病房。
其子女已入住儿科重症监护病房的父母、护士和医生。
无。
结果测量是 74 项满意护理项目,分为五个领域:1)信息;2)护理和治疗;3)组织;4)父母参与;和 5)专业态度。德尔菲研究由 218 名护士和 46 名医生完成,调查由 1042 名父母中的 559 名(54%)完成。根据标准化均数差(Cohen's d,0.21-1.18,p<.003),父母对 31 项护理内容的重要性评分高于专业人员。其中 10 项与信息提供有关。关于药物影响的信息具有最大的效应量(Cohen's d 1.18,p=.001)。父母还对专业人员正确的药物管理评价显著更高(Cohen's d 0.64,p=.001)。专业人员对 12 项护理内容的重要性评分高于父母(Cohen's d -0.23 至-0.73,p<.005),包括三项关于多元文化护理的内容。当荷兰父母(n=483)和非荷兰父母(n=76)与专业人员分别比较时,这三项多元文化护理内容中的两项仍存在显著差异。在领域水平上,父母对信息和父母参与领域的评价高于专业人员(Cohen's d 0.36 和 0.26,p=.001)。
与父母的看法相比,护士和医生低估了大量儿科重症监护病房护理内容的重要性。这一发现可能反映了对父母体验的理解差距,以及对父母需求的认识不一致。