Scott R, Nankervis K, Stringer C, Westcott K, Marlin D
The Equine Therapy Centre, Hartpury College, Gloucester, UK.
Equine Vet J Suppl. 2010 Nov(38):662-4. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00194.x.
Water treadmill exercise is often incorporated into rehabilitation programmes for horses yet little is known about the biomechanical and physiological responses to water walking.
To establish whether stride frequency (SF) reached steady state as a result of 6 introductory water treadmill sessions and then to investigate the effect of increasing water height on SF, stride length (SL) and heart rate (HR).
Nine horses with no previous experience of water treadmills completed 6 sessions of walking for between 15 and 30 min. Each horse was fitted with a leg mounted accelerometer to measure SF. The effect of session on SF was tested using univariate ANOVA. Eight horses completed 3 further sessions at each of the following water heights; proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), carpus and ulna. SF, SL and HR at each water height were compared to a control (hoof height) using univariate ANOVA.
When SF during introductory sessions 4-6 were compared, there was no significant effect of session on SF (P > 0.05). In the second part of the experiment, SF was 0.57 ± 0.03 strides/s at control, 0.54 ± 0.03 strides/s at the PIP joint, 0.51 ± 0.02 strides/s at the carpus and 0.52 ± 0.03 strides/s at the ulna. Stride frequency at carpal and ulna height was significantly lower than at control (P < 0.05). Stride length was 1.53 ± 0.09 m for control, 1.63 ± 0.10 m at the PIP joint, 1.71 ± 0.08 m at the carpus and 1.68 ± 0.10 m at the ulna. Stride length at carpal and ulna height was significantly greater than control (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between HR during control and any other water height (P > 0.05).
Horses reached steady state gait within the first 6 sessions of water treadmill exercise. Walking in water at the level of the carpus or ulna resulted in a lower SF compared to walking in water at hoof height.
水疗跑步机运动常被纳入马匹康复计划中,但对于在水中行走的生物力学和生理反应却知之甚少。
确定经过6次水疗跑步机入门训练后步频(SF)是否达到稳定状态,然后研究增加水的高度对步频、步长(SL)和心率(HR)的影响。
9匹此前没有水疗跑步机经验的马完成了6次时长为15至30分钟的行走训练。每匹马都佩戴了一个安装在腿部的加速度计来测量步频。使用单因素方差分析来测试训练对步频的影响。8匹马在以下每个水的高度又完成了3次训练;近侧指间关节(PIP)、腕关节和尺骨高度。使用单因素方差分析将每个水高度下的步频、步长和心率与对照组(蹄高)进行比较。
比较入门训练第4至6次训练期间的步频时,训练对步频没有显著影响(P>0.05)。在实验的第二部分,对照组的步频为0.57±0.03步/秒,PIP关节处为0.54±0.03步/秒,腕关节处为0.51±0.02步/秒,尺骨高度处为0.52±0.03步/秒。腕关节和尺骨高度处的步频显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组的步长为1.53±0.09米,PIP关节处为1.63±0.10米,腕关节处为1.71±0.08米,尺骨高度处为1.68±0.10米。腕关节和尺骨高度处的步长显著大于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组与其他任何水高度下的心率之间没有显著差异(P>0.05)。
马匹在水疗跑步机运动的前6次训练中达到了稳定的步态。与在蹄高的水中行走相比,在腕关节或尺骨高度的水中行走导致步频降低。