Rehabilitation Center De Hoogstraat, Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
BMC Pediatr. 2010 Nov 8;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-80.
Little is known about the efficacy and the working mechanisms of physical and occupational therapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy (CP). In recent years a shift from a child-focused intervention approach to a more context-focused intervention approach can be recognized. Until now the evidence on the efficacy and the working mechanisms of these interventions for children with CP is inconclusive. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and working mechanisms of two intervention approaches compared to regular care intervention in improving mobility and self-care skills of children (2-3 years) with CP and their families: a child-focused intervention approach and a context-focused intervention approach.
METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-centre, randomized controlled trial research design will be used. Ninety-four children with CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I-IV; age 2 to 3 years), their parents, and service providers (physical and occupational therapists) will be included. During a period of six months children will receive child-focused, context-focused or regular care intervention. Therapists will be randomly assigned to deliver either a child-focused intervention approach, a context-focused intervention approach or regular care intervention. Children follow their therapist into the allocated intervention arm. After the six months study-intervention period, all participants return to regular care intervention. Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, after six months and at a three months follow-up period. Primary outcome is the capability of functional skills in self-care and mobility, using the Functional Skills Scale of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Other outcomes will be quality of life and the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - for Children and Youth (ICF-CY), including body function and structure, activities (gross motor capacity and performance of daily activities), social participation, environmental variables (family functioning, parental empowerment).
This paper presents the background information, design, description of interventions and protocol for this study on the efficacy and working mechanisms of child-focused intervention approach and context-focused intervention approach compared to regular care intervention in mobility and self-care skills of children (2-3 years) with CP.
This study is registered in the Dutch Trial Register as NTR1900.
对于脑瘫(CP)患儿的物理治疗和职业治疗干预措施的疗效和作用机制知之甚少。近年来,人们可以认识到从以儿童为中心的干预方法向更注重环境的干预方法的转变。到目前为止,对于这些干预措施对 CP 患儿的疗效和作用机制的证据尚无定论。本研究旨在评估两种干预方法(以儿童为中心的干预方法和以环境为中心的干预方法)与常规护理干预相比,在提高 2-3 岁 CP 患儿及其家庭的移动能力和自理技能方面的疗效和作用机制:以儿童为中心的干预方法和以环境为中心的干预方法。
方法/设计:将采用多中心、随机对照试验研究设计。将纳入 94 名 CP 患儿(粗大运动功能分级系统(GMFCS)I-IV 级;年龄 2-3 岁)、他们的父母和服务提供者(物理治疗师和职业治疗师)。在六个月的时间内,儿童将接受以儿童为中心、以环境为中心或常规护理干预。治疗师将被随机分配提供以儿童为中心的干预方法、以环境为中心的干预方法或常规护理干预。儿童跟随他们的治疗师进入分配的干预组。在六个月的研究干预期结束后,所有参与者都返回常规护理干预。在基线、六个月后和三个月随访期间评估结果。主要结局是使用残疾儿童评估量表(PEDI)的自理和移动功能量表(功能性技能量表)评估自理技能的功能能力。其他结果将是生活质量和国际功能、残疾和健康分类-儿童和青少年(ICF-CY)的领域,包括身体功能和结构、活动(粗大运动能力和日常活动表现)、社会参与、环境变量(家庭功能、父母赋权)。
本文介绍了背景信息、设计、干预措施的描述以及该研究的方案,比较了以儿童为中心的干预方法和以环境为中心的干预方法与常规护理干预在 CP 患儿(2-3 岁)移动和自理技能方面的疗效和作用机制。
本研究在荷兰试验注册处注册为 NTR1900。