Institut für Philosophie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 45117 Essen, Deutschland.
J Med Ethics. 2011 Mar;37(3):158-61. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036723. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
This paper argues against Appel's recent proposal-in this journal-that there is a fundamental human right to sexual pleasure, and that therefore the sexual pleasure of severely disabled people should be publicly funded-by thereby partially legalising prostitution. An alternative is proposed that does not need to pose a new positive human right; does not need public funding; does not need the legalisation of prostitution; and that would offer a better experience to the severely disabled: charitable non-profit organisations whose members would voluntarily and freely provide sexual pleasure to the severely disabled.
本文反对 Appel 最近在本刊上提出的观点，即人有享受性愉悦的基本人权，因此应该由公共资金来支付严重残障人士的性愉悦费用，从而使卖淫部分合法化。本文提出了一种替代方案，该方案不需要设定新的积极人权；不需要公共资金；不需要卖淫合法化；并且可以为严重残障人士提供更好的体验：慈善非营利组织，其成员将自愿和自由地为严重残障人士提供性愉悦。
