• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Anent the theoretical justification of a sex doula program.关于性陪产员项目的理论依据。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Apr;44(2):125-140. doi: 10.1007/s11017-023-09612-8. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
2
Whither a Welfare-Funded 'Sex Doula' Programme?福利资助的“性陪护师”项目何去何从?
J Med Ethics. 2019 Jun;45(6):361-364. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105330. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
Access to Sexual Rights for People Living with Disabilities: Assumptions, Evidence, and Policy Outcomes.残疾人的性权利获取:假设、证据与政策成果
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Nov;52(8):3201-3255. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02372-x. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
4
Predictors of negative beliefs toward the sexual rights and perceived sexual healthcare needs of people with physical disabilities in South Africa.南非身体残疾者对性权利的负面观念和性健康需求的预测因素。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Dec;42(25):3664-3672. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1608323. Epub 2019 May 11.
5
Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities.没什么好羞愧的:为残障老年群体提供性机器人。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):26-32. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106645. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
6
The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its take on sexuality.残疾人权利委员会及其对性取向的看法。
Reprod Health Matters. 2017 May;25(50):92-103. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1332449.
7
The sexual and reproductive rights and benefit derived from sexual and reproductive health services of people with physical disabilities in South Africa: beliefs of non-disabled people.南非身体残疾者的性与生殖权利以及从性与生殖健康服务中获得的益处:非残疾者的观念
Reprod Health Matters. 2017 May;25(50):66-79. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1332949.
8
Why Has So Little Progress Been Made in the Practice of Occupational Therapy in Relation to Sexuality?为何职业治疗在性方面的实践进展如此之少?
Am J Occup Ther. 2016 Jan-Feb;70(1):7001360010p1-5. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.017707.
9
Breaking the taboo: qualitative analysis of the sexuality in people with acquired motor disability.打破禁忌:对后天运动障碍者性问题的定性分析。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Nov 8;11(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01423-9.
10
[Sexual citizenship education for people with mental health problems].为有心理健康问题的人开展性公民教育
Sante Ment Que. 2010 Autumn;35(2):209-26. doi: 10.7202/1000560ar.

本文引用的文献

1
Just Better Utilitarianism.更好的功利主义
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Apr;30(2):343-367. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120000882. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
2
Are sex robots enough?性机器人够吗?
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):35. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106928. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
Sexual rights puzzle: re-solved?性权利之谜:解决了?
J Med Ethics. 2020 May;46(5):337-338. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105642. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
4
Whither a Welfare-Funded 'Sex Doula' Programme?福利资助的“性陪护师”项目何去何从?
J Med Ethics. 2019 Jun;45(6):361-364. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105330. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
The Quality Adjusted Life Year: A Total-Utility Perspective.质量调整生命年:一种总效用视角。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018 Apr;27(2):284-294. doi: 10.1017/S0963180117000615.
6
Rethinking Sexual Citizenship.重新思考性公民身份。
Sociology. 2017 Apr;51(2):208-224. doi: 10.1177/0038038515609024. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
7
Positive sexuality and its impact on overall well-being.积极的性观念及其对整体幸福感的影响。
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 Feb;56(2):208-14. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1607-z.
8
Sexual rights and disability.性权利与残疾
J Med Ethics. 2011 Mar;37(3):158-61. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036723. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
9
Sex rights for the disabled?残疾人的性权利?
J Med Ethics. 2010 Mar;36(3):152-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033183.
10
Sexual well-being, happiness, and satisfaction, in women: the case for a new conceptual paradigm.女性的性健康、幸福与满意度:一种新的概念范式之实例
J Sex Marital Ther. 2008;34(4):291-7; discussion 298-307. doi: 10.1080/00926230802096234.

关于性陪产员项目的理论依据。

Anent the theoretical justification of a sex doula program.

机构信息

University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.

出版信息

Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Apr;44(2):125-140. doi: 10.1007/s11017-023-09612-8. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11017-023-09612-8
PMID:36826740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10030400/
Abstract

The Human Condition is neither a well-defined nor well-described concept-nevertheless, it is generally agreed that human sexuality is a fundamental and constituent part of it. For most able-bodied persons, accessing and expressing one's sexuality is a (relatively) trouble-free process. However, many disabled persons experience difficulty in accessing their sexuality, while others experience such significant barriers that they are often precluded from sexual citizenship altogether. Recognising the barriers to the sexual citizenship of disabled persons, the concept of a Welfare-Funded Sex Doula Program has been advanced - a program specifically aimed at meeting the various (and often complex) sexual needs of disabled people. Below we show how that program can be justified within at least two different moral frameworks, the capabilities approach and liberal utilitarianism, and consider and repudiate arguments against it.

摘要

人的状况既不是一个明确的也不是一个描述得很好的概念——尽管如此,人们普遍认为,人的性行为是其基本和构成部分。对于大多数身体健全的人来说,获得和表达自己的性行为是一个(相对)没有麻烦的过程。然而,许多残疾人在获得性行为方面遇到困难,而另一些残疾人则遇到了如此重大的障碍,以至于他们完全被排除在性公民身份之外。鉴于残疾人的性公民权面临障碍,提出了福利资助性伴侣计划的概念——这是一个专门旨在满足残疾人各种(往往是复杂的)性需求的方案。下面我们展示了该方案如何在至少两种不同的道德框架内得到证明,即能力方法和自由功利主义,并考虑和驳斥了反对该方案的论点。