University of Cambridge and Lupus and Vasculitis Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, England.
JAMA. 2010 Dec 1;304(21):2381-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1658. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
Current remission maintenance therapies for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) are limited by partial efficacy and toxicity.
To compare the effects of mycophenolate mofetil with azathioprine on the prevention of relapses in patients with AAV.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label randomized controlled trial, International Mycophenolate Mofetil Protocol to Reduce Outbreaks of Vasculitides (IMPROVE), to test the hypothesis that mycophenolate mofetil is more effective than azathioprine for preventing relapses in AAV. The trial was conducted at 42 centers in 11 European countries between April 2002 and January 2009 (42-month study). Eligible patients had newly diagnosed AAV (Wegener granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis) and were aged 18 to 75 years at diagnosis.
Patients were randomly assigned to azathioprine (starting at 2 mg/kg/d) or mycophenolate mofetil (starting at 2000 mg/d) after induction of remission with cyclophosphamide and prednisolone.
The primary end point was relapse-free survival, which was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. The secondary end points were Vasculitis Damage Index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and proteinuria.
A total of 156 patients were assigned to azathioprine (n = 80) or mycophenolate mofetil (n = 76) and were followed up for a median of 39 months (interquartile range, 0.66-53.6 months). All patients were retained in the analysis by intention to treat. Relapses were more common in the mycophenolate mofetil group (42/76 patients) compared with the azathioprine group (30/80 patients), with an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mycophenolate mofetil of 1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.70; P = .03). Severe adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. There were 22 severe adverse events in 13 patients (16%) in the azathioprine group and there were 8 severe adverse events in 8 patients (7.5%) in the mycophenolate mofetil group (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.23-1.18]; P = .12). The secondary outcomes of Vasculitis Damage Index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and proteinuria did not differ significantly between groups.
Among patients with AAV, mycophenolate mofetil was less effective than azathioprine for maintaining disease remission. Both treatments had similar adverse event rates.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00307645.
目前,针对抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体(ANCA)相关性血管炎(AAV)的缓解维持治疗方法疗效有限且存在毒性。
比较霉酚酸酯与硫唑嘌呤对预防 AAV 复发的效果。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项开放性标签、随机对照临床试验,即国际霉酚酸酯方案以减少血管炎发作(IMPROVE),旨在检验以下假设,即霉酚酸酯在预防 AAV 复发方面比硫唑嘌呤更有效。该试验于 2002 年 4 月至 2009 年 1 月在欧洲 11 个国家的 42 个中心进行(42 个月的研究)。合格的患者患有新诊断的 AAV(韦格纳肉芽肿或显微镜下多血管炎),在诊断时年龄为 18 至 75 岁。
在环磷酰胺和泼尼松诱导缓解后,患者被随机分配接受硫唑嘌呤(起始剂量为 2mg/kg/d)或霉酚酸酯(起始剂量为 2000mg/d)治疗。
主要终点是无复发生存,采用 Cox 比例风险模型进行评估。次要终点是血管炎损伤指数、估计肾小球滤过率和蛋白尿。
共有 156 名患者被分配至硫唑嘌呤组(n=80)或霉酚酸酯组(n=76),并接受了中位数为 39 个月(四分位距,0.66-53.6 个月)的随访。所有患者均按意向治疗进行分析。与硫唑嘌呤组(30/80 例)相比,霉酚酸酯组(42/76 例)的复发更为常见,霉酚酸酯的未调整风险比(HR)为 1.69(95%置信区间[CI],1.06-2.70;P=0.03)。两组严重不良事件发生率无显著差异。硫唑嘌呤组有 13 名患者(16%)发生 22 例严重不良事件,霉酚酸酯组有 8 名患者(7.5%)发生 8 例严重不良事件(HR,0.53[95%CI,0.23-1.18];P=0.12)。两组血管炎损伤指数、估计肾小球滤过率和蛋白尿的次要结局无显著差异。
在 AAV 患者中,霉酚酸酯在维持疾病缓解方面不如硫唑嘌呤有效。两种治疗方法的不良事件发生率相似。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00307645。