de Joode Anoek A E, Sanders Jan Stephan F, Puéchal Xavier, Guillevin Loic P, Hiemstra Thomas F, Flossmann Oliver, Rasmussen Nils, Westman Kerstin, Jayne David R, Stegeman Coen A
Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital Cochin.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Nov 1;56(11):1894-1901. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex281.
We studied whether in ANCA-associated vasculitis patients, duration of AZA maintenance influenced relapse rate during long-term follow-up.
Three hundred and eighty newly diagnosed ANCA-associated vasculitis patients from six European multicentre studies treated with AZA maintenance were included; 58% were male, median age at diagnosis 59.4 years (interquartile range: 48.3-68.2 years); granulomatosis with polyangiitis, n = 236; microscopic polyangiitis, n = 132; or renal limited vasculitis, n = 12. Patients were grouped according to the duration of AZA maintenance after remission induction: ⩽18 months, ⩽24 months, ⩽36 months, ⩽48 months or > 48 months. Primary outcome was relapse-free survival at 60 months.
During follow-up, 84 first relapses occurred during AZA-maintenance therapy (1 relapse per 117 patient months) and 71 after withdrawal of AZA (1 relapse/113 months). During the first 12 months after withdrawal, 20 relapses occurred (1 relapse/119 months) and 29 relapses >12 months after withdrawal (1 relapse/186 months). Relapse-free survival at 60 months was 65.3% for patients receiving AZA maintenance >18 months after diagnosis vs 55% for those who discontinued maintenance ⩽18 months (P = 0.11). Relapse-free survival was associated with induction therapy (i.v. vs oral) and ANCA specificity (PR3-ANCA vs MPO-ANCA/negative).
Post hoc analysis of combined trial data suggest that stopping AZA maintenance therapy does not lead to a significant increase in relapse rate and AZA maintenance for more than 18 months after diagnosis does not significantly influence relapse-free survival. ANCA specificity has more effect on relapse-free survival than duration of maintenance therapy and should be used to tailor therapy individually.
我们研究了在抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎患者中,硫唑嘌呤(AZA)维持治疗的持续时间是否会影响长期随访期间的复发率。
纳入了来自六项欧洲多中心研究的380例接受AZA维持治疗的新诊断ANCA相关血管炎患者;58%为男性,诊断时的中位年龄为59.4岁(四分位间距:48.3 - 68.2岁);其中肉芽肿性多血管炎236例,显微镜下多血管炎132例,或肾脏局限性血管炎12例。患者根据缓解诱导后AZA维持治疗的持续时间分组:≤18个月、≤24个月、≤36个月、≤48个月或>48个月。主要结局是60个月时的无复发生存率。
在随访期间,84例首次复发发生在AZA维持治疗期间(每117患者月1例复发),71例在停用AZA后复发(每113个月1例复发)。在停药后的前12个月内,发生20例复发(每119个月1例复发),停药>12个月后发生29例复发(每186个月1例复发)。诊断后接受AZA维持治疗>18个月的患者60个月时的无复发生存率为65.3%,而停药≤18个月的患者为55%(P = 0.11)。无复发生存率与诱导治疗(静脉注射与口服)和ANCA特异性(蛋白酶3 - ANCA与髓过氧化物酶 - ANCA/阴性)相关。
对联合试验数据的事后分析表明,停用AZA维持治疗不会导致复发率显著增加,诊断后AZA维持治疗超过18个月对无复发生存率无显著影响。ANCA特异性对无复发生存率的影响大于维持治疗的持续时间,应据此进行个体化治疗调整。