Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Nov;25(11):1657-60. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.11.1657. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
We investigated which of the three FRAX fracture risk assessment tool models is most applicable to Korean women. For 306 postmenopausal women (mean age, 77 yr) with a hip fracture, fracture probabilities were calculated using FRAX models from Japan, Turkey and China. Data on bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck were available for 103 patients. Significant differences existed among the models, independent of the inclusion of BMD in the calculation of fracture probabilities. The probabilities of both major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures were significantly higher in the Japanese model than in the Turkish or Chinese models. In all of the models, the probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture, but not of a hip fracture, decreased significantly if calculated without BMD values. By applying the Japanese model, the ten-year probabilities for major osteoporotic and hip fractures increased significantly with age. Our results suggest that the Japanese FRAX model might be the most appropriate for Korean women.
我们研究了三种 FRAX 骨折风险评估工具模型中哪一种最适用于韩国女性。对 306 名绝经后髋部骨折女性(平均年龄 77 岁),使用来自日本、土耳其和中国的 FRAX 模型计算骨折概率。103 名患者的股骨颈骨密度(BMD)数据可用。独立于骨折概率计算中是否包含 BMD,各模型之间存在显著差异。日本模型的主要骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折概率明显高于土耳其或中国模型。在所有模型中,如果不使用 BMD 值计算,主要骨质疏松性骨折的概率而非髋部骨折的概率显著降低。通过应用日本模型,主要骨质疏松性和髋部骨折的十年概率随年龄显著增加。我们的结果表明,日本 FRAX 模型可能最适合韩国女性。