Reid W Darlene, Brown Jennifer A, Konnyu Kristin J, Rurak Jennifer M E, Sakakibara Brodie M
Muscle Biophysics Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2010;33(4):353-70. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2010.11689714.
To address whether secretion removal techniques increase airway clearance in people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).
MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to May 2009 for population keywords (spinal cord injury, paraplegia, tetraplegia, quadriplegia) paired with secretion removal-related interventions and outcomes. Inclusion criteria for articles were a research study, irrespective of design, that examined secretion removal in people with chronic SCI published in English.
Two reviewers determined whether articles met the inclusion criteria, abstracted information, and performed a quality assessment using PEDro or Downs and Black criteria. Studies were then given a level of evidence based on a modified Sackett scale.
Of 2416 abstracts and titles retrieved, 24 met the inclusion criteria. Subjects were young (mean, 31 years) and 84% were male. Most evidence was level 4 or 5 and only 2 studies were randomized controlled trials. Three reports described outcomes for secretion removal techniques in addition to cough, whereas most articles examined the immediate effects of various components of cough. Studies examining insufflation combined with manual assisted cough provided the most consistent, high-level evidence. Compelling recent evidence supports the use of respiratory muscle training or electrical stimulation of the expiratory muscles to facilitate airway clearance in people with SCI.
Evidence supporting the use of secretion removal techniques in SCI, while positive, is limited and mostly of low level. Treatments that increase respiratory muscle force show promise as effective airway clearance techniques.
探讨分泌物清除技术是否能提高慢性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的气道清除能力。
检索MEDLINE/PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE和PsycINFO数据库,时间跨度从建库至2009年5月,检索词为人群关键词(脊髓损伤、截瘫、四肢瘫、四肢麻痹)与分泌物清除相关干预措施及结果的组合。纳入标准为英文发表的关于慢性SCI患者分泌物清除的研究,研究设计不限。
两名评审员确定文章是否符合纳入标准,提取信息,并使用PEDro或唐斯和布莱克标准进行质量评估。然后根据改良的萨克特量表为研究给出证据等级。
在检索到的2416篇摘要和标题中,24篇符合纳入标准。受试者较年轻(平均31岁),84%为男性。大多数证据为4级或5级,只有2项研究为随机对照试验。3篇报告除了咳嗽外还描述了分泌物清除技术的结果,而大多数文章研究了咳嗽各个组成部分的即时效果。研究吹入法结合人工辅助咳嗽提供了最一致的高级别证据。最近有令人信服的证据支持使用呼吸肌训练或呼气肌电刺激来促进SCI患者的气道清除。
支持在SCI中使用分泌物清除技术的证据虽然是积极的,但有限且大多级别较低。增加呼吸肌力量的治疗方法有望成为有效的气道清除技术。