Health Management Research Center, University of Michigan, 1015 East Huron Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1688, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Nov;52(11):1055-67. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f475cc.
The objective of this commentary is to discuss the issues surrounding the concept of presenteeism, including the measurement of lost work time per individual, the conversion of the scores attained by the instruments into expressions of productivity loss, and the translation of productivity losses into economic outcomes.
Literature searches using PubMed and MEDLINE were conducted using "presenteeism" and "productivity" as keywords and combined with other studies known to the authors. Publications on presenteeism instruments and their applications were included.
Substantive questions remain about the measurement of presenteeism, its conversion into lost productivity, and the translation of presenteeism into financial equivalents.
Many aspects of presenteeism still warrant caution, especially when using presenteeism measurements to quantify economic outcomes. Focusing on productivity at the population level, rather than the individual level, may be more appropriate.
本述评旨在讨论与出勤主义概念相关的问题,包括对个体丧失工作时间的衡量、将测评工具的得分转化为生产力损失的表达,以及将生产力损失转化为经济结果。
使用 PubMed 和 MEDLINE 数据库,以“出勤主义”和“生产力”为关键词进行文献检索,并结合作者已知的其他研究。纳入有关出勤主义测评工具及其应用的出版物。
关于出勤主义的衡量、将其转化为生产力损失,以及将出勤主义转化为财务等价物,仍存在实质性问题。
出勤主义的许多方面仍值得谨慎对待,特别是在使用出勤主义测评来量化经济结果时。将重点放在人群层面的生产力上,而不是个体层面上,可能更为恰当。