University of Minnesota Tobacco Use Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jan;20(1):91-100. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0349. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
Smokeless, spitless tobacco products are being introduced and marketed as cigarette substitutes. Data are needed regarding how smokers interested in cessation would use these products, the levels of resultant toxicant exposure, and the feasibility of using these products as aids for tobacco cessation.
Smokers were randomized to receive Camel Snus (n = 51), Taboka (n = 52), or medicinal nicotine (n = 27) and required to quit smoking for 4 weeks. Measures of toxicant exposure and symptoms of craving and withdrawal were assessed prior to and during product use.
Concentrations of exhaled carbon monoxide, urinary cotinine, urinary 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronides (total NNAL), and urinary N'-nitrosonornicotine and its glucuronide (total NNN) were significantly (P values <0.05) lower at the end of treatment in each group except for total NNN in those receiving Camel Snus (P = 0.066). A significant group × time effect was observed for total NNAL concentrations (P = 0.002) with the decrease greatest in the medicinal nicotine group and smallest decrease in the Camel Snus group. No significant differences between groups were found in craving and withdrawal symptoms.
Enrolling smokers into a cessation study utilizing newer smokeless tobacco products is feasible. Camel Snus and Taboka use was not found to be superior to medicinal nicotine in reducing withdrawal symptoms but decreases in NNAL were smaller in users of Camel Snus.
This study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a smoking cessation study utilizing these newer tobacco products. An appropriately powered study is needed to assess smoking cessation rates using these newer products compared with established, safer products such as medicinal nicotine.
无烟气、无唾液的烟草制品作为香烟替代品正在被推出和销售。我们需要了解对戒烟有兴趣的吸烟者将如何使用这些产品,他们接触到的毒素水平,以及这些产品作为戒烟辅助手段的可行性。
吸烟者被随机分为三组,分别接受骆驼鼻烟(Camel Snus)(n = 51)、Taboka(n = 52)或药用尼古丁(n = 27),并要求他们在 4 周内戒烟。在使用产品之前和期间,评估了接触毒素的情况以及对烟瘾和戒断症状的反应。
除了接受骆驼鼻烟的组(P = 0.066)外,呼气一氧化碳、尿液可铁宁、尿液 4-(甲基亚硝胺基)-1-(3-吡啶基)-1-丁醇及其葡萄糖醛酸(总 NNAL)、尿液 N'-亚硝基降烟碱及其葡萄糖醛酸(总 NNN)的浓度在治疗结束时在每个组中均显著(P 值<0.05)降低。在总 NNAL 浓度上观察到组间×时间的显著效应(P = 0.002),药用尼古丁组的降幅最大,骆驼鼻烟组的降幅最小。在吸烟欲望和戒断症状方面,组间没有发现显著差异。
招募吸烟者参加利用新型无烟烟草制品进行的戒烟研究是可行的。在降低戒断症状方面,骆驼鼻烟和 Taboka 的使用并不优于药用尼古丁,但骆驼鼻烟使用者的 NNAL 下降幅度较小。
本研究证明了利用这些新型烟草制品进行戒烟研究的可行性。需要进行一项有足够样本量的研究,以评估这些新型产品与药用尼古丁等更安全的戒烟产品相比,在戒烟方面的效果。