• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高大型产业资助临床试验的学术领导力和监督:ARO-CRO 模式。

Improving academic leadership and oversight in large industry-sponsored clinical trials: the ARO-CRO model.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Blood. 2011 Feb 17;117(7):2089-92. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-308858. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1182/blood-2010-09-308858
PMID:21068436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3062324/
Abstract

Standards for clinical trial design, execution, and publication have increased in recent years. However, the current structure for interaction among the pharmaceutical sponsor funding a drug or device development program, the contract research organization (CRO) that typically assists in executing the trial, regulatory agencies, and academicians, provides inadequate leadership and oversight of the development process. Conventional academic steering committees are not provided with the independent infrastructure by which to verify statistical analyses and conclusions regarding safety and efficacy. We propose an alternative approach centered on partnerships between CROs and university-based academic research organizations (AROs). In this model, the ARO takes responsibility for processes that address journal requirements and regulatory expectations for independent academic oversight (including oversight of Steering Committee and Data and Safety Monitoring Board activities), whereas the CRO provides infrastructure for efficient trial execution, site monitoring, and data management. The ARO engages academic experts throughout the trial process and minimizes conflicts of interest in individual industry relationships via diversification of sponsors, agents, and therapeutic areas. Although numerous models can be entertained, the ARO-CRO model is uniquely structured to meet the demand for greater assurance of integrity in clinical trials and the needs of each stakeholder in the process.

摘要

近年来,临床试验设计、执行和发表的标准有所提高。然而,目前由制药赞助商为药物或设备开发项目提供资金、通常协助执行试验的合同研究组织(CRO)、监管机构和学者之间的互动结构,为开发过程提供的领导力和监督不足。传统的学术指导委员会没有提供独立的基础设施来验证安全性和疗效的统计分析和结论。我们提出了一种替代方法,以 CRO 和大学学术研究组织(ARO)之间的伙伴关系为中心。在这种模式下,ARO 负责满足期刊要求和监管机构对独立学术监督的期望的流程(包括对指导委员会和数据和安全监测委员会活动的监督),而 CRO 则提供高效的试验执行、现场监测和数据管理的基础设施。ARO 在整个试验过程中聘请学术专家,并通过赞助商、代理人和治疗领域的多样化,最大限度地减少个别行业关系中的利益冲突。尽管可以考虑许多模式,但 ARO-CRO 模式是专门为满足对临床试验完整性的更高保证的需求以及该过程中每个利益相关者的需求而构建的。

相似文献

1
Improving academic leadership and oversight in large industry-sponsored clinical trials: the ARO-CRO model.提高大型产业资助临床试验的学术领导力和监督:ARO-CRO 模式。
Blood. 2011 Feb 17;117(7):2089-92. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-308858. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
Clinical trials integrity: a CRO perspective.临床试验的完整性:合同研究组织的视角
Account Res. 2001;8(3):245-60. doi: 10.1080/08989620108573977.
4
Oversight of financial conflicts of interest in commercially sponsored research in academic and nonacademic settings.对学术和非学术环境中商业赞助研究的财务利益冲突的监督。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 May;25(5):460-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1264-6. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
5
Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.涉及人类的研究中的利益冲突。
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0143.
6
Conflicts of interest in data monitoring of industry versus publicly financed clinical trials.行业资助与公共资助的临床试验数据监测中的利益冲突。
Stat Med. 2004 May 30;23(10):1519-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.1787.
7
Current practice and perspectives in CRO oversight based on a survey performed among members of the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (vfa).基于对德国创新型制药企业协会(vfa)成员进行的一项调查,CRO监管的当前实践与展望
Ger Med Sci. 2017 Jan 26;15:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/000243. eCollection 2017.
8
A call to rethink the necessity of and challenges facing academic research organizations in the new era of drug innovation in China.呼吁重新思考中国新药创新时代学术研究机构的必要性和面临的挑战。
Drug Discov Today. 2024 Apr;29(4):103925. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.103925. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
9
Ethics and industry-sponsored research.伦理与行业资助的研究
CMAJ. 2002 Mar 5;166(5):579-80; author reply 582.
10
A third trial oversight committee: Functions, benefits and issues.第三个试验监督委员会:职能、益处和问题。
Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;17(1):106-112. doi: 10.1177/1740774519881619. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
POLARIS: efficacy and safety of a vaginal medical device in recurrent bacterial vaginosis-a multicenter, open-label, non-controlled, study with 10 months of follow-up.北极星:一种阴道医疗器械在复发性细菌性阴道病中的疗效和安全性 - 一项为期 10 个月随访的多中心、开放标签、非对照研究。
J Int Med Res. 2024 May;52(5):3000605241239021. doi: 10.1177/03000605241239021.
2
Performance and Safety of a New Medical Device (Polybactum) for Reducing the Recurrence Rate of Bacterial Vaginosis: Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label, Noncontrolled International Clinical Trial (POLARIS Study).一种用于降低细菌性阴道病复发率的新型医疗器械(Polybactum)的性能与安全性:一项多中心、开放标签、非对照国际临床试验方案(北极星研究)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 20;12:e42787. doi: 10.2196/42787.
3
Randomized Controlled Trials in Lung, Gastrointestinal, and Breast Cancers: An Overview of Global Research Activity.随机对照试验在肺癌、胃肠道癌和乳腺癌中的应用:全球研究活动概述。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Apr 7;29(4):2530-2538. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29040207.
4
Building a Fit for Purpose Clinical Trials Infrastructure to Accelerate the Assessment of Novel Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Strategies and Cellular Immunotherapies.构建适用于特定目的的临床试验基础设施,以加速新型造血细胞移植策略和细胞免疫疗法的评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 10;39(5):534-544. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01623. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Performance Index for Types of Clinical Research Support Service Providers for Academic Research Organizations in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Survey.日本学术研究机构临床研究支持服务提供商类型绩效指标:横断面调查。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Mar;14(2):745-755. doi: 10.1111/cts.12942. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
6
Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors.学术机构与产业界在临床试验中的合作:对出版物的横断面研究和主要学术作者的调查。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 3;363:k3654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3654.
7
Examining the effect of teleconferences on oncology phase 1 trials.考察远程会议对肿瘤学 1 期临床试验的影响。
J Cancer. 2013 Jul 4;4(6):464-7. doi: 10.7150/jca.6626. Print 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.临床试验注册中心登记的药物试验结局报告。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 3;153(3):158-66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00006.
2
Don't mess with the DSMB.别惹数据安全监测委员会。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 29;363(5):477-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1007445. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
3
Better infrastructure: industry-academia partnerships--a marriage of convenience?更好的基础设施:产学研合作——权宜之计的结合?
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1 Suppl):S159-64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181920725.
4
Observational studies of drug safety--aprotinin and the absence of transparency.药物安全性的观察性研究——抑肽酶与缺乏透明度
N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 23;355(21):2171-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068252.
5
Uneasy alliance--clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry.不安的联盟——临床研究人员与制药行业
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1539-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422024.
6
Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group.高血压患者随机接受多沙唑嗪与氯噻酮治疗后的主要心血管事件:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)。ALLHAT协作研究组
JAMA. 2000 Apr 19;283(15):1967-75.