Wig Jai Dev, Gupta Vikas, Kochhar Rakesh, Doley Rudra Prasad, Yadav Thakur Deen, Poornachandra Kuchhangi S, Bharathy Kishore Gurumoorthy Subramanya, Kalra Naveen
Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
JOP. 2010 Nov 9;11(6):553-9.
Non-operative strategies are gaining preference in the management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of a non-operative approach, including percutaneous drainage, in the management of severe acute pancreatitis.
Prospective study.
Tertiary care centre in India.
Fifty consecutive patients with severe acute pancreatitis were managed in an intensive care unit.
The patients were initially managed conservatively. Those with 5 cm, or more, of fluid collection having fever, leukocytosis or organ failure underwent percutaneous catheter drainage using a 10 Fr catheter. Those not responding underwent a necrosectomy. Depending on the outcome of their supportive care, the patients were divided into three groups: those responding to intensive care, those needing percutaneous catheter drainage and those requiring surgical intervention. Twelve patients were managed conservatively (Group 1) while 24 underwent percutaneous catheter drainage (Group 2), 9 of whom were not operated (Group 2a) and 15 of whom underwent necrosectomy (Group 2b). Fourteen patients were operated on directly (Group 3).
Hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, and mortality.
Among patients requiring surgery, the patients in Group 2b had a shorter intensive care unit stay (22.1±11.1 days) as compared to the patients in Group 3 (25.0±15.6 days) and a longer interval to surgery, 30.7±8.9 days versus 25.4±8.5 days. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance (P=0.705 and P=0.133, respectively). The two groups did not differ in terms of mortality (5/15 versus 3/14; P=0.682).
The use of percutaneous catheter drainage helped avoid or delay surgery in two-fifths of the patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
在重症急性胰腺炎患者的管理中,非手术策略越来越受到青睐。
本研究旨在评估包括经皮引流在内的非手术方法在重症急性胰腺炎管理中的疗效。
前瞻性研究。
印度的三级医疗中心。
50例连续的重症急性胰腺炎患者在重症监护病房接受治疗。
患者最初接受保守治疗。对于有5厘米或更大积液且伴有发热、白细胞增多或器官功能衰竭的患者,使用10F导管进行经皮导管引流。无反应者接受坏死组织切除术。根据其支持治疗的结果,将患者分为三组:对重症监护有反应者、需要经皮导管引流者和需要手术干预者。12例患者接受保守治疗(第1组),24例接受经皮导管引流(第2组),其中9例未进行手术(第2a组),15例接受坏死组织切除术(第2b组)。14例患者直接进行手术(第3组)。
住院时间、重症监护病房停留时间和死亡率。
在需要手术的患者中,第2b组患者的重症监护病房停留时间(22.1±11.1天)比第3组患者(25.0±15.6天)短,手术间隔时间更长,分别为30.7±8.9天和25.4±8.5天。然而,这些差异未达到统计学意义(分别为P = 0.705和P = 0.133)。两组在死亡率方面无差异(5/15对3/14;P = 0.682)。
经皮导管引流的使用有助于五分之二的重症急性胰腺炎患者避免或推迟手术。