Pollack Charles V
Department of Emergency Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2010 Nov;38(4):29-37. doi: 10.3810/hp.2010.11.337.
Emergency department physicians, along with hospitalists and interventional cardiologists, provide first-line care for patients experiencing symptoms potentially associated with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Because these health care providers encounter and manage patients with varying degrees of risk, a clear understanding of the modes of action, benefits, and limitations of various therapeutic options is crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in the acute-care setting. Oral antiplatelet therapy has a major role in the acute care of patients with suspected ACS due to the critical role of platelets in the pathophysiology of disease. The current standard-of-care oral antiplatelet therapy for ACS is aspirin in combination with a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist, most commonly clopidogrel. Aspirin and P2Y12 antagonists have both demonstrated efficacy in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with ACS, but are also associated with increased bleeding risk compared with controls. Additionally, despite dual oral antiplatelet therapy, patients remain at substantial residual risk for ischemic events due to thrombotic episodes driven by platelet activation pathways that are not inhibited by these agents, including the protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 platelet activation pathway, stimulated by thrombin. Novel oral antiplatelet agents in advanced clinical development include a direct and more readily reversible P2Y12 antagonist, ticagrelor, as well as a new class of PAR-1 antagonists, which includes vorapaxar and atopaxar. Ticagrelor has shown a significant ischemic benefit and an increase in non-surgical bleeding over clopidogrel in the large phase 3 Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes trial. Results of phase 2 trials with PAR-1 antagonists suggest that these agents may provide incremental reduction in ischemic events without a bleeding liability. This hypothesis is being evaluated in 2 large ongoing phase 3 trials with vorapaxar, including the Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRA*CER) trial in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS.
急诊科医生与住院医师和介入心脏病专家一起,为出现可能与急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)相关症状的患者提供一线治疗。由于这些医疗服务提供者会接诊和处理风险程度各异的患者,因此清楚了解各种治疗选择的作用方式、益处和局限性,对于在急性护理环境中实现最佳治疗效果至关重要。口服抗血小板治疗在疑似ACS患者的急性护理中发挥着重要作用,因为血小板在疾病的病理生理过程中起着关键作用。目前ACS的标准口服抗血小板治疗方案是阿司匹林联合P2Y12二磷酸腺苷(ADP)受体拮抗剂,最常用的是氯吡格雷。阿司匹林和P2Y12拮抗剂在降低ACS患者的发病率和死亡率方面均已显示出疗效,但与对照组相比,也会增加出血风险。此外,尽管采用了双重口服抗血小板治疗,但由于这些药物无法抑制的血小板激活途径(包括凝血酶刺激的蛋白酶激活受体(PAR)-1血小板激活途径)引发的血栓形成事件,患者仍面临相当大的缺血事件残余风险。处于临床开发后期的新型口服抗血小板药物包括一种直接且更易于逆转的P2Y12拮抗剂替格瑞洛,以及一类新的PAR-1拮抗剂,其中包括沃拉帕沙和阿托帕沙。在大型3期血小板抑制与患者预后试验中,替格瑞洛已显示出显著的缺血获益,且与氯吡格雷相比非手术出血有所增加。PAR-1拮抗剂的2期试验结果表明,这些药物可能在不增加出血风险的情况下进一步降低缺血事件。这一假设正在两项正在进行的针对沃拉帕沙的大型3期试验中进行评估,其中包括急性冠状动脉综合征临床事件减少凝血酶受体拮抗剂(TRA*CER)试验,该试验针对的是非ST段抬高型ACS患者。