Cattedra di Cardiologia, Seconda Università di Napoli, UOC di Cardiologia a Direzione Universitaria, A.O. Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano - Caserta, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2013 Dec;14 Suppl 1:S22-30. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328364bb18.
The options for antithrombotic therapy have recently been expanded, facilitating optimal tailored treatment. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and an approved adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor antagonist is recommended for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, there are a number of controversies: which P2Y12 inhibitor to choose; how long should antiplatelet therapy be used so as to prevent thrombotic events and minimize bleeding risks; whether to use drug-eluting (DES) or bare-metal stents (BMS) and how to manage the individual variability in response to clopidogrel. Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin has been the standard dual antiplatelet regimen for ACS. The new, more potent P2Y12 inhibitors, prasugrel and ticagrelor, have shown improved antithrombotic effects compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS (with or without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) in landmark trials, even if they were associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. Different pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics may explain, in part, the different pharmacologic and clinical responses to these antiplatelet agents. Importantly, both clopidogrel and prasugrel are prodrugs, i.e., they need to be converted in vivo into active metabolites that selectively and irreversibly bind the P2Y12 receptor. Unlike clopidogrel, however, common functional cytochrome P450 genetic variants do not affect prasugrel active metabolite levels or inhibition of platelet aggregation. In contrast, ticagrelor is not a prodrug (i.e., does not require hepatic metabolism to exert its antiplatelet effect) and represents the first oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist that is reversibly bound. Similar to prasugrel, ticagrelor achieves greater and more rapid inhibition of platelet function than clopidogrel. Evidence suggests that the new P2Y12 antagonists may offer improved antithrombotic effects compared with clopidogrel in selected patients for the optimal management of ACS in clinical practice.
抗血栓治疗的选择最近有所扩大,有利于实现最佳的个体化治疗。对于急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者,建议采用阿司匹林联合一种已批准的二磷酸腺苷(ADP)P2Y12 受体拮抗剂进行双联抗血小板治疗。然而,目前存在一些争议:应选择哪种 P2Y12 抑制剂;为了预防血栓事件并将出血风险降至最低,抗血小板治疗应持续多长时间;是否使用药物洗脱支架(DES)或金属裸支架(BMS),以及如何管理对氯吡格雷反应的个体差异。氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林一直是 ACS 的标准双联抗血小板治疗方案。在标志性试验中,新型、更有效的 P2Y12 抑制剂普拉格雷和替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比,在 ACS(伴或不伴 ST 段抬高心肌梗死)患者中显示出了改善的抗血栓作用,尽管它们与大出血风险增加相关。不同的遗传药理学和药效学特征可能部分解释了这些抗血小板药物的不同药理和临床反应。重要的是,氯吡格雷和普拉格雷都是前体药物,也就是说,它们需要在体内转化为活性代谢物,才能选择性和不可逆地结合 P2Y12 受体。然而,与氯吡格雷不同的是,常见的功能性细胞色素 P450 遗传变异不会影响普拉格雷的活性代谢物水平或血小板聚集的抑制。相比之下,替格瑞洛不是前体药物(也就是说,不需要肝脏代谢即可发挥抗血小板作用),并且是第一个可逆结合的口服 P2Y12 受体拮抗剂。与普拉格雷类似,替格瑞洛比氯吡格雷更能迅速抑制血小板功能。有证据表明,在某些患者中,新型 P2Y12 拮抗剂可能比氯吡格雷提供更好的抗血栓作用,从而优化 ACS 的临床管理。