Synarc Imaging Technologies A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jul;22(7):2119-28. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1436-6. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
Early prognosis of osteoporosis risk is not only important to individual patients but is also a key factor when screening for osteoporosis drug trial populations. We present an osteoporosis fracture risk score based on vertebral heights. The score separated individuals who sustained fractures (by follow-up after 6.3 years) from healthy controls at baseline.
This case-control study was designed to assess the ability of three novel fracture risk scoring methods to predict first incident lumbar vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women matched for classical risk factors such as BMD, BMI, and age.
This was a case-control study of 126 postmenopausal women, 25 of whom sustained at least one incident lumbar fracture and 101 controls that maintained skeletal integrity over a 6.3-year period. Three methods for fracture risk assessment were developed and tested. They are based on anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral heights measured from vertebrae T12-L5 in lumbar radiographs at baseline. Each score's fracture prediction potential was investigated in two variants using (1) measurements from the single most deformed vertebra or (2) average measurements across vertebrae T12-L5. Emphasis was given to the vertebral fracture risk (VFR) score.
All scoring methods demonstrated significant separation of cases from controls at baseline. Specifically, for the VFR score, cases and controls were significantly different (0.67 ± 0.04 vs. 0.35 ± 0.03, p < 10 (-6)) with an AUC of 0.82. Dividing the VFR scores into tertiles, the fracture odds ratio for the highest versus lowest tertile was 35 (p < 0.001). Sorting the combined case-control group according to VFR score resulted in 90% of cases in the top half.
At baseline, the three scores separated cases from controls and, especially, the VFR score appears to be predictive of fractures. Control experiments, however also, indicate that VFR-based fracture prediction is operator/annotator dependent and high-quality annotations are needed for good fracture prediction.
骨质疏松风险的早期预后不仅对个体患者很重要,而且也是筛选骨质疏松药物试验人群的关键因素。我们提出了一种基于椎体高度的骨质疏松骨折风险评分。该评分将在随访 6.3 年后发生骨折的个体与基线时健康对照组区分开来。
本病例对照研究旨在评估三种新型骨折风险评分方法预测绝经后妇女首次发生腰椎骨折的能力,这些妇女在 BMD、BMI 和年龄等经典危险因素方面相匹配。
这是一项对 126 名绝经后妇女的病例对照研究,其中 25 名发生至少一处腰椎骨折,101 名对照组在 6.3 年内保持骨骼完整。开发并测试了三种骨折风险评估方法。它们基于基线时腰椎 X 光片上 T12-L5 椎体的前、中、后椎体高度测量值。每个评分的骨折预测潜力在两种变体中进行了研究,使用(1)来自单个变形最严重的椎体的测量值或(2)T12-L5 椎体的平均测量值。重点是椎体骨折风险(VFR)评分。
所有评分方法在基线时均能显著区分病例和对照组。具体来说,对于 VFR 评分,病例组和对照组之间存在显著差异(0.67±0.04 对 0.35±0.03,p<10(-6)),AUC 为 0.82。将 VFR 评分分为三分位,最高与最低三分位的骨折优势比为 35(p<0.001)。根据 VFR 评分对合并病例对照组进行排序,结果显示前一半组中有 90%的病例。
在基线时,这三个评分将病例与对照组区分开来,尤其是 VFR 评分似乎可以预测骨折。然而,对照实验也表明,基于 VFR 的骨折预测依赖于操作者/注释者,并且需要高质量的注释才能进行良好的骨折预测。