• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撤回:用于辅助阴道分娩的真空吸引术与产钳术对比

WITHDRAWN: Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.

作者信息

Johanson Richard, Menon Vijay

机构信息

(Deceased) North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD000224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000224.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000224.pub2
PMID:21069665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10775758/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proponents of vacuum delivery argue that it should be chosen first for assisted vaginal delivery, because it is less likely to injure the mother.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of vacuum extraction compared to forceps, on failure to achieve delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. Date of last search: February 1999.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Acceptably controlled comparisons of vacuum extraction and forceps delivery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials were included. The trials were of reasonable quality. Use of the vacuum extractor for assisted vaginal delivery when compared to forceps delivery was associated with significantly less maternal trauma (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.50) and with less general and regional anaesthesia. There were more deliveries with vacuum extraction (odds ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 2.19). Fewer caesarean sections were carried out in the vacuum extractor group. However the vacuum extractor was associated with an increase in neonatal cephalhaematomata and retinal haemorrhages. Serious neonatal injury was uncommon with either instrument.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Use of the vacuum extractor rather than forceps for assisted delivery appears to reduce maternal morbidity. The reduction in cephalhaematoma and retinal haemorrhages seen with forceps may be a compensatory benefit.

摘要

背景

真空分娩的支持者认为,对于辅助阴道分娩,应首选真空分娩,因为它对母亲造成伤害的可能性较小。

目的

本综述的目的是评估与产钳相比,真空吸引对分娩失败以及母婴发病率的影响。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库。最后检索日期:1999年2月。

选择标准

对真空吸引和产钳分娩进行可接受的对照比较。

数据收集与分析

两位评价者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。与研究作者联系以获取更多信息。

主要结果

纳入了10项试验。这些试验质量合理。与产钳分娩相比,使用真空吸引器进行辅助阴道分娩时,产妇创伤显著减少(比值比0.41,95%置信区间0.33至0.50),全身麻醉和区域麻醉也较少。真空吸引分娩的次数更多(比值比1.69,95%置信区间1.31至2.19)。真空吸引器组进行剖宫产的次数较少。然而,真空吸引器与新生儿头颅血肿和视网膜出血的增加有关。两种器械导致严重新生儿损伤的情况均不常见。

作者结论

辅助分娩时使用真空吸引器而非产钳似乎可降低产妇发病率。产钳导致的头颅血肿和视网膜出血减少可能是一种代偿性益处。

相似文献

1
WITHDRAWN: Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.撤回:用于辅助阴道分娩的真空吸引术与产钳术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD000224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000224.pub2.
2
Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.用于辅助阴道分娩的真空吸引术与产钳术比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000224.
3
Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery.阴道助产器械的选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10(11):CD005455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub2.
4
Instruments for assisted vaginal birth.用于辅助阴道分娩的器械。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):CD005455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub3.
5
Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section.剖宫产术中困难分娩的辅助技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 31;2016(1):CD004944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004944.pub3.
6
Antibiotic prophylaxis for operative vaginal delivery.手术助产的抗生素预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD004455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004455.pub4.
7
Antibiotic prophylaxis for operative vaginal delivery.剖宫产术的抗生素预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD004455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004455.pub2.
8
Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.用于宫颈成熟和引产的一氧化氮供体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;12(12):CD006901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006901.pub3.
9
WITHDRAWN: Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery.撤回:用于辅助阴道分娩的软质与硬质真空吸引杯
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD000446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000446.pub2.
10
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnitude, Indications, and Factors Associated With Operative Vaginal Delivery Among Mothers Who Gave Birth at Adama Hospital Medical College, Ethiopia, 2022.2022年埃塞俄比亚阿达马医院医学院分娩的母亲中手术阴道分娩的发生率、指征及相关因素
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Jun 12;9:23779608231180382. doi: 10.1177/23779608231180382. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
DECIDE: a cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce non-medically indicated caesareans in Burkina Faso.DECIDE:一项在布基纳法索减少非医学指征剖宫产的整群随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1112-8.
3
Impact of increasing capacity for generating and using research on maternal and perinatal health practices in South East Asia (SEA-ORCHID Project).提高东南亚地区孕产妇和围产健康实践中研究的产生和利用能力的影响(SEA-ORCHID 项目)。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023994. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
4
Perineal care.会阴护理。
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Apr 11;2011:1401.