Suppr超能文献

阴道分娩时会阴三度和四度撕裂的抗生素预防

Antibiotic prophylaxis for third- and fourth-degree perineal tear during vaginal birth.

作者信息

Buppasiri Pranom, Lumbiganon Pisake, Thinkhamrop Jadsada, Thinkhamrop Bandit

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40002.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10(11):CD005125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005125.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One to eight per cent of women suffer third-degree perineal tear (anal sphincter injury) and fourth-degree perineal tear (rectal mucosa injury) during vaginal birth, and these tears are more common after forceps delivery (28%) and midline episiotomies. Third- and fourth-degree tears can become contaminated with bacteria from the rectum and this significantly increases in the chance of perineal wound infection. Prophylactic antibiotics might have a role in preventing this infection.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for reducing maternal morbidity and side effects in third- and fourth-degree perineal tear during vaginal birth.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2010) and the reference lists of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing outcomes of prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no antibiotics in third- and fourth-degree perineal tear during vaginal birth.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the reports and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified and included one trial (147 participants) that compared the effect of prophylactic antibiotic (single-dose, second generation cephalosporin, intravenously) on postpartum perineal wound complications in third- or fourth-degree perineal tears. Perineal wound complications (wound disruption and purulent discharge) at the two-week postpartum check up were 8.20% and 24.10% in the treatment and the control groups respectively (risk ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.96).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although the data suggest that prophylactic antibiotics help to prevent perineal wound complications following third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, loss to follow-up was very high. The results should be interpreted with caution as they are based on one small trial.

摘要

背景

1%至8%的女性在阴道分娩时会发生三度会阴撕裂(肛门括约肌损伤)和四度会阴撕裂(直肠黏膜损伤),这些撕裂在产钳助产(28%)和会阴正中切开术后更为常见。三度和四度撕裂可能会被来自直肠的细菌污染,这会显著增加会阴伤口感染的几率。预防性使用抗生素可能有助于预防这种感染。

目的

评估预防性使用抗生素对降低阴道分娩时三度和四度会阴撕裂产妇发病率及副作用的有效性。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2010年8月31日)以及检索到文章的参考文献列表。

入选标准

比较预防性使用抗生素与安慰剂或不使用抗生素在阴道分娩时三度和四度会阴撕裂结局的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估报告并提取数据。

主要结果

我们识别并纳入了一项试验(147名参与者),该试验比较了预防性使用抗生素(单剂量第二代头孢菌素,静脉注射)对三度或四度会阴撕裂产后会阴伤口并发症的影响。产后两周检查时,治疗组和对照组的会阴伤口并发症(伤口裂开和脓性分泌物)发生率分别为8.20%和24.10%(风险比0.34,95%置信区间0.12至0.96)。

作者结论

尽管数据表明预防性使用抗生素有助于预防三度或四度会阴撕裂后的会阴伤口并发症,但失访率非常高。由于这些结果基于一项小型试验,应谨慎解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验