Orthopaedic Surgery Division, University of Montreal, Hôpital du Sacré Coeur, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Dec;19(8):1121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.003.
Shoulder instability is common. Multiple questionnaires are used in clinical studies. The purpose of this study is to find and synthesize evidence on the usefulness of self-administered questionnaires specific to shoulder instability.
We undertook a systematic review using a standard search strategy (publications from 1966-2008) on databases (Medline, Embase); a structured search was conducted and supplemented by expert consultation. Raters conducted data extraction and critical appraisal using structured tools. A descriptive synthesis was performed.
In total, 25 published questionnaires used for patients with shoulder instability were identified. The Rowe questionnaire is the oldest and the most frequently used scale. After excluding questionnaires that were not validated, that necessitated physical examination, or that did not address instability symptoms, we identified 3 validated self-report measures specific to shoulder instability: Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Oxford Shoulder Instability Questionnaire, and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Scale. Quality ratings on validation studies varied from 50% to 79%. A failure to establish clear guidelines for interpretation was a common flaw. Although there are insufficient studies (n = 3) to determine the best measure, the WOSI appears to have the best supporting evidence with excellent reliability/responsiveness (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95; effect size, 0.93).
Evidence for the psychometric properties of shoulder instability is limited but suggests that reliable and responsive measures are available. More studies of the WOSI and competing scales in head-to-head comparison are needed to determine their optimal usage. Cultural adaptation is also needed to permit widespread usage.
Reliable and responsive measures are available to evaluate patients with shoulder instability.
肩部不稳定很常见。临床研究中使用了多种问卷。本研究旨在寻找和综合有关专门针对肩部不稳定的自我管理问卷的有用性的证据。
我们使用标准检索策略(1966 年至 2008 年的出版物)对数据库(Medline、Embase)进行了系统回顾;进行了结构化搜索,并辅以专家咨询。评分者使用结构化工具进行数据提取和批判性评价。进行了描述性综合。
共确定了 25 份用于肩部不稳定患者的已发表问卷。Rowe 问卷是最古老和最常用的量表。在排除了未经验证、需要体格检查或不涉及不稳定症状的问卷后,我们确定了 3 种经过验证的专门针对肩部不稳定的自我报告措施:Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index(WOSI)、Oxford Shoulder Instability Questionnaire 和 Melbourne Instability Shoulder Scale。验证研究的质量评分从 50%到 79%不等。一个常见的缺陷是未能为解释制定明确的准则。尽管没有足够的研究(n=3)来确定最佳的测量方法,但 WOSI 似乎具有最佳的支持证据,具有极好的可靠性/响应性(组内相关系数为 0.95;效应量为 0.93)。
肩部不稳定的心理测量特性的证据有限,但表明有可靠和敏感的措施可用。需要更多关于 WOSI 和竞争量表的研究,以进行头对头比较,以确定其最佳使用方法。还需要文化适应性,以允许广泛使用。
有可靠和敏感的措施可用于评估肩部不稳定的患者。