Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, 185 Berry Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Biomech. 2011 Jan 11;44(2):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
Determination of osteoporotic status is based primarily on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) obtained through dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, many fractures occur in patients with T-scores above the WHO threshold of osteoporosis, in part because DXA measures are insensitive to biomechanically important alterations in bone quality. The goal of this study was to determine--within groups of subjects with identical radius aBMD values--the extant variation in densitometric, geometric, microstructural, and biomechanical parameters. High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and DXA radius data from males and females spanning large ranges in age, osteoporotic status, and anthropometrics were compiled. 262 distal radius datasets were processed for this study. HR-pQCT scans were analyzed according to the manufacturer's standard clinical protocol to quantify densitometric, geometric, and microstructural indices. Micro-finite element analysis was performed to calculate biomechanical indices. Factor of risk of wrist fracture was calculated. Simulated aBMD calculated from HR-pQCT data was used to group scans for evaluation of variation in quantified indices. Indices reflecting the greatest variation within aBMD level were BMD in the central portion of the trabecular compartment (max CV 142), trabecular heterogeneity (max CV 90), and intra-cortical porosity (max CV 151). Of the biomechanical indices, cortical load fraction had the greatest variation (max CV 38). Substantial variations in indices reflecting density, structure, and biomechanical competence exist among subjects with identical aBMD levels. Overlap of these indices among osteoporotic status groups reflects the reported incidence of osteoporotic fracture in subjects classified as osteopenic or normal.
骨质疏松症的确定主要基于通过双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)获得的面积骨密度(aBMD)。然而,许多骨折发生在 T 分数高于世界卫生组织骨质疏松阈值的患者中,部分原因是 DXA 测量对骨质量的生物力学重要变化不敏感。本研究的目的是在具有相同桡骨 aBMD 值的受试者组内确定密度计、几何形状、微观结构和生物力学参数的现存差异。收集了年龄、骨质疏松症状态和人体测量学范围广泛的男性和女性的高分辨率外周定量计算机断层扫描(HR-pQCT)和 DXA 桡骨数据。本研究处理了 262 个远端桡骨数据集。根据制造商的标准临床方案分析 HR-pQCT 扫描,以量化密度计、几何形状和微观结构指数。进行微有限元分析以计算生物力学指数。计算手腕骨折风险因子。使用 HR-pQCT 数据计算模拟的 aBMD 来分组扫描,以评估量化指数的变化。在 aBMD 水平内变化最大的指数是骨小梁隔中央部分的 BMD(最大 CV 142)、骨小梁异质性(最大 CV 90)和皮质内孔隙率(最大 CV 151)。在生物力学指数中,皮质负荷分数的变化最大(最大 CV 38)。具有相同 aBMD 水平的受试者之间存在反映密度、结构和生物力学能力的指数存在显著差异。骨质疏松症状态组之间这些指数的重叠反映了报告的骨质疏松性骨折发生率在被归类为骨质疏松或正常的患者中。