Division of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Feb;33(2):328-337. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3299. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
A majority of low-trauma fractures occur in subjects with only moderate decrease of areal bone mineral density (aBMD), ie, osteopenia, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or low fracture probability assessed by FRAX. We investigated whether peripheral bone microstructure and estimated strength improve the prediction of incident fractures beyond central DXA and FRAX. In this population-based study of 740 postmenopausal women (aged 65.0 ± 1.4 years) from the Geneva Retirees Cohort (ISRCTN registry 11865958), we assessed at baseline cortical (Ct) and trabecular (Tb) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and microstructure by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT); bone strength by micro-finite element analysis; aBMD and trabecular bone score (TBS) by DXA; and FRAX fracture probability. Eighty-five low-trauma fractures occurred in 68 women over a follow-up of 5.0 ± 1.8 years. Tb and Ct vBMD and microstructure predicted incident fractures, independently of each other and of femoral neck (FN) aBMD and FRAX (with BMD ± TBS). However, the associations were markedly attenuated after adjustment for ultra-distal radius aBMD (same bone site). The best discrimination between women with and without fracture was obtained at the radius with total vBMD, the combination of a Tb with a Ct parameter, or with failure load, which improved the area under the curve (AUC) for major osteoporotic fracture when added to FN aBMD (0.760 versus 0.695, p = 0.022) or to FRAX-BMD (0.759 versus 0.714, p = 0.015). The replacement of failure load by ultra-distal aBMD did not significantly decrease the AUC (0.753, p = 0.747 and 0.750, p = 0.509, respectively). In conclusion, peripheral bone microstructure and strength improve the prediction of fractures beyond central DXA and FRAX but are partially captured in aBMD measured by DXA at the radius. Because HR-pQCT is not widely available for clinical purposes, assessment of ultra-distal radius aBMD by DXA may meanwhile improve fracture risk estimation. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
大多数低创伤性骨折发生在仅中度降低的骨密度(aBMD)的患者中,即双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)评估的骨质疏松症或通过 FRAX 评估的低骨折概率。我们研究了外周骨微观结构和估计强度是否可以改善中央 DXA 和 FRAX 以外的骨折预测。在这项基于人群的研究中,对来自日内瓦退休人员队列(ISRCTN 注册中心 11865958)的 740 名绝经后妇女(年龄 65.0±1.4 岁)进行了研究,我们在基线时通过外周定量计算机断层扫描(HR-pQCT)评估了皮质(Ct)和小梁(Tb)容积骨密度(vBMD)和微观结构;通过微有限元分析评估骨强度;通过 DXA 评估 aBMD 和小梁骨评分(TBS);以及 FRAX 骨折概率。在 5.0±1.8 年的随访中,68 名女性发生了 85 例低创伤性骨折。Tb 和 Ct vBMD 和微观结构独立于股骨颈(FN)aBMD 和 FRAX(与 BMD±TBS)预测了骨折事件。然而,在调整超远端桡骨 aBMD 后,这些相关性明显减弱(同一骨部位)。在桡骨中,使用总 vBMD、Tb 和 Ct 参数的组合或使用失效负荷来区分骨折妇女和非骨折妇女,可以改善 FN aBMD(0.760 与 0.695,p=0.022)或 FRAX-BMD(0.759 与 0.714,p=0.015)时的主要骨质疏松性骨折曲线下面积(AUC)。用超远端 aBMD 替代失效负荷不会显著降低 AUC(0.753,p=0.747 和 0.750,p=0.509)。总之,外周骨微观结构和强度改善了中央 DXA 和 FRAX 以外的骨折预测,但在桡骨 DXA 测量的 aBMD 中部分捕捉到。由于 HR-pQCT 目前不广泛用于临床目的,因此同时评估桡骨的超远端 aBMD 可能会改善骨折风险评估。© 2017 年美国骨与矿物研究协会。