• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生服务研究:人体受试者保护法规中的方枘圆凿。

Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations.

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University, School of Nursing, 19000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):118-22. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037226. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2010.037226
PMID:21071571
Abstract

Protection of human participants is a fundamental facet of biomedical research. We report the activities of a health service research study in which there were three institutional review boards (IRBs), three legal departments and one research administration department providing recommendations and mandating changes in the study methods. Complying with IRB requirements can be challenging, but can also adversely affect study outcomes. Multiple protocol changes mandated from multiple IRBs created a research method that was not reflective of how substance use screening would be performed in a clinical setting. There was direct conflict between the IRBs' perceptions of participants' protection with the researchers' need to use research methodology that assures the clinical relevancy of results.

摘要

保护人类参与者是生物医学研究的一个基本方面。我们报告了一项卫生服务研究的活动,其中有三个机构审查委员会(IRB)、三个法律部门和一个研究管理部门提供建议,并要求更改研究方法。遵守 IRB 的要求可能具有挑战性,但也可能对研究结果产生不利影响。多个 IRB 强制要求的多项方案变更导致研究方法无法反映在临床环境中进行药物使用筛查的方式。IRB 对参与者保护的看法与研究人员需要使用确保研究结果临床相关性的研究方法之间存在直接冲突。

相似文献

1
Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations.卫生服务研究:人体受试者保护法规中的方枘圆凿。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):118-22. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037226. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
2
Public health practice vs research: implications for preparedness and disaster research review by State Health Department IRBs.公共卫生实践与研究:对州卫生部机构审查委员会的准备工作及灾害研究审查的影响
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008 Oct;2(3):185-91. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318187310c.
3
A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.一项关于机构审查委员会成员使用知情同意紧急例外情况审查研究提案的经验的定性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2007 May;33(5):289-93. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014878.
4
Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.关于储存血液和组织样本研究的知情同意:机构审查委员会实践调查
Account Res. 2002 Jan-Mar;9(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/08989620210354.
5
A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给机构审查委员会警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Dec;27(6):316-23.
6
Federal commissions and local IRBs.联邦委员会和地方机构审查委员会。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1983 Oct;13(5):11-2.
7
Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.知情同意的例外情况:机构审查委员会的观点——平衡对受试者的风险、社区咨询及未来方向
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.015.
8
Ethical review of research involving human subjects: when and why is IRB review necessary?涉及人类受试者的研究的伦理审查:机构审查委员会(IRB)审查在何时以及为何是必要的?
Muscle Nerve. 2003 Jul;28(1):27-39. doi: 10.1002/mus.10398.
9
Commentary: systems, rules and the costs of being ethical--a response to D. Chalmers and to S. Whitney and C. Schneider.评论:体系、规则与道德成本——对D. 查尔默斯、S. 惠特尼和C. 施奈德的回应
J Intern Med. 2011 Apr;269(4):403-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02351_3.x.
10
Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues.基于实践的研究网络研究与机构审查委员会:两个新问题。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):453-60. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.04.080168.

引用本文的文献

1
How variability in the institutional review board review process affects minimal-risk multisite health services research.机构审查委员会审查过程的变异性如何影响低风险多地点卫生服务研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):728-35. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00011.