Ohno Kazuchika, Noguchi Yoshihiro, Kawashima Yoshiyuki, Yagishita Kazuyoshi, Kitamura Ken
Department of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Med Dent Sci. 2010 Jun;57(2):127-32.
This study investigated the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as a secondary treatment for patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) in the subacute and chronic phases. Forty-eight ISSNHL patients (HBOT group) who had received primary conventional treatment within 4 weeks after onset and underwent HBOT between 4 and 20 weeks post-onset were retrospectively compared with 44 ISSNHL patients (control group) with primary conventional treatment alone. Mean hearing gain was slight, with gains of 5.2 +/- 8.9 dB in the HBOT group and 2.0 +/- 7.6 dB in the control group. However, no significant difference was recognized between the two groups. In the HBOT group, no significant difference was observed in hearing gain among patients with HBOT initial time at 4-7, 8-11, 12-15 or 16-20 weeks after onset. Meanwhile, hearing gain was significantly higher in patients with profound hearing loss than in the other patients. We conclude that the effectiveness of secondary HBOT for ISSNHL patients in either subacute or chronic phase remains unproven, and thus, the decision administer HBOT should be made with caution.
本研究调查了高压氧疗法(HBOT)作为特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失(ISSNHL)患者亚急性期和慢性期二线治疗方法的疗效。对48例发病后4周内接受了初始常规治疗且在发病后4至20周接受高压氧治疗的ISSNHL患者(高压氧治疗组)与44例仅接受初始常规治疗的ISSNHL患者(对照组)进行回顾性比较。平均听力改善轻微,高压氧治疗组听力提高5.2±8.9dB,对照组提高2.0±7.6dB。然而,两组之间未发现显著差异。在高压氧治疗组中,发病后4至7周、8至11周、12至15周或16至20周开始接受高压氧治疗的患者之间,听力改善情况未观察到显著差异。同时,重度听力损失患者的听力改善显著高于其他患者。我们得出结论,高压氧疗法作为ISSNHL患者亚急性期或慢性期的二线治疗方法,其有效性尚未得到证实,因此,是否给予高压氧治疗应谨慎决定。