Suppr超能文献

中国农村妇女对分娩护理的利用:医疗保险有影响吗?一项横断面研究。

Utilization of delivery care among rural women in China: does the health insurance make a difference? a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2010 Nov 15;10:695. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-695.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2003, the New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) has been implemented throughout rural China, usually covering delivery services in its benefit package. The objective of this study was to compare the difference of utilization of delivery services, expenditures, and local women's perceived affordability between women with and without reimbursement from NCMS.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was carried out in two rural counties in Shaanxi province, China, during December 2008-March 2009. Women giving birth from April 2008 to March 2009 were interviewed by a structured questionnaire to collect information on utilization of delivery services. Multivariable analyses were used to compare the differences in outcomes between women with and without reimbursement from NCMS.

RESULTS

Of the total 1613 women interviewed, 747(46.3%) got reimbursement to cover their expenditure on delivery care (NCMS group) and 866(53.7%) paid delivery services entirely out of their own pocket (Non-NCMS group). Compared with the Non-NCMS group, the NCMS group had significantly more women who delivered at hospital. The rate of Caesarean section (CS), proportion of women seeking higher level services, and length of hospitalization were similar between the two groups. The total hospital costs for delivery services in the NCMS group was significantly smaller and after being reimbursed, the out-of-pocket payment in the NCMS group was less than a half of that in the Non-NCMS group. Fewer women in the NCMS group than in the Non-NCMS group considered their payment for delivery services expensive.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of overuse delivery services among the women reimbursed by NCMS. Total hospital costs and women's costs for delivery services were found lower in the NCMS group, subsequently alleviation on women's perceived financial affordability.

摘要

背景

自 2003 年以来,新型农村合作医疗制度(NCMS)已在中国农村全面实施,通常在其福利套餐中涵盖分娩服务。本研究的目的是比较有报销和无报销的农村妇女在利用分娩服务、支出和当地妇女对可负担性的感知方面的差异。

方法

本研究于 2008 年 12 月至 2009 年 3 月在陕西省的两个农村县进行了一项横断面调查。通过结构化问卷采访了 2008 年 4 月至 2009 年 3 月分娩的妇女,以收集分娩服务利用情况的信息。采用多变量分析比较了有报销和无报销的妇女在结局方面的差异。

结果

在接受采访的 1613 名妇女中,有 747 名(46.3%)获得了报销,以支付分娩护理费用(NCMS 组),866 名(53.7%)完全自费支付分娩服务费用(非 NCMS 组)。与非 NCMS 组相比,NCMS 组中有更多的妇女在医院分娩。两组剖宫产率(CS)、寻求更高水平服务的妇女比例和住院时间相似。NCMS 组的分娩服务总住院费用明显较小,报销后,NCMS 组的自费支付费用不到非 NCMS 组的一半。NCMS 组中有较少的妇女认为分娩服务费用昂贵。

结论

NCMS 报销的妇女没有过度使用分娩服务的证据。NCMS 组的总住院费用和妇女的分娩服务费用较低,从而减轻了妇女对经济负担的感知。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a9f/3091584/abdfc74c69fe/1471-2458-10-695-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验