School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76 West Yanta Road, P.O Box 86, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 5;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0852-7.
China's New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) enables insured citizens to enjoy the same benefit package by paying a flat-rate premium. However, it still remains uncertain whether economically disadvantaged enrollees receive insurance benefits that at least match those of non-disadvantaged enrollees. This article, therefore, estimates the distribution of benefits under the NCMS across economic groups and compares the magnitude of economic-related inequity changes in the NCMS benefits.
Data were drawn from two-wave large-scale representative and comparable cross-sectional household health survey datasets conducted in Shaanxi Province in 2008 and 2013. In total, 9506 (2008) and 38,010 (2013) NCMS enrollees were included. The benefits from the NCMS are measured in two ways: via the probability of receiving reimbursements and via the absolute amount of the obtained reimbursements. Two-part models were used to estimate the benefit distribution and to adjust benefits for health care needs. Concentration curve, dominance test of the concentration curve, and concentration index (CI) were used to estimate the overall degree of economic-related inequality. The degree of horizontal inequity was estimated via indirectly standardized measures based on the "equal treatment for equal needs" concept.
Our results indicate that economically affluent groups were more likely to receive reimbursements from the NCMS, and these reimbursements were also higher. Positive need-adjusted CIs for the probability of receiving reimbursements (CIs: 0.2027/0.1056 in 2008/2013) and the absolute amount of reimbursements (CIs: 0.3002/0.1660 in 2008/2013) further suggest the existence of clear pro-rich horizontal inequities in the benefits distribution under the NCMS. Encouragingly, a decreasing trend could be observed from 2008 to 2013, which suggests that horizontal inequities in NCMS benefits that favored the rich decreased over the investigated period, while the level of insurance benefits improved.
Our study suggests that the benefits of NCMS are concentrated toward economically affluent groups. Although any trade-off between policy feasibility and equity has become a challenge for the formulation of social health insurance funding and benefit packages in developing countries, inequality can be gradually reduced through continuous adjustment of the medical insurance scheme, thus effectively targeting economically disadvantaged enrollees.
中国的新型农村合作医疗制度(NCMS)通过缴纳统一费率的保费,使参保公民享有相同的福利待遇。然而,目前仍不确定经济弱势群体的参保人是否能获得与非弱势群体参保人至少相当的保险福利。因此,本文旨在评估 NCMS 制度下各经济群体的受益分布情况,并比较 NCMS 受益的经济相关不公平性变化程度。
数据来自于 2008 年和 2013 年在陕西省进行的两轮大规模具有代表性且可比的家庭健康调查数据集。共有 9506 名(2008 年)和 38010 名(2013 年)NCMS 参保人纳入研究。通过两种方式衡量 NCMS 的受益情况:一是获得报销的概率,二是获得的报销金额绝对值。采用两部分模型来估计受益分布,并根据卫生保健需求调整受益。使用集中曲线、集中曲线的优势检验和集中指数(CI)来评估整体经济相关不平等程度。基于“同等需求同等待遇”的理念,通过间接标准化措施来评估水平不公平程度。
结果表明,经济富裕群体更有可能从 NCMS 获得报销,且报销金额也更高。获得报销的概率(2008 年和 2013 年的 CI 分别为 0.2027/0.1056)和报销金额绝对值(2008 年和 2013 年的 CI 分别为 0.3002/0.1660)的正向需求调整 CI 进一步表明,NCMS 制度下的受益分配存在明显的有利于富人的水平不公平。令人鼓舞的是,从 2008 年到 2013 年,可以观察到一个下降的趋势,这表明在研究期间,有利于富人的 NCMS 受益的水平不公平性有所减少,而保险受益水平有所提高。
本研究表明,NCMS 的受益集中在经济富裕群体。虽然在制定发展中国家社会健康保险筹资和福利方案时,政策可行性和公平性之间的任何权衡都已成为一个挑战,但通过不断调整医疗保险计划,可以逐步减少不平等,从而有效地针对经济弱势群体。