Mahmoud Wael E, Hassanein Mahmoud M, Nour El-Din Moustafa M, Elbeltagy Sherif M, Sadaka Mohamed A
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2010;85(1-2):1-28.
Risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) aims to identify those patients who might benefit prognostically from further investigation and treatment. In addition, risk stratification models have been used by health authorities and hospitals in quality management activities.
The present study aimed at validating the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores for prediction of mortality in patients with ACS in Alexandria governorate. In addition, the study aimed also at using one of the validated risk scores to compare risk adjusted mortality among participating hospitals.
The study was conducted at hospitals belonging to 3 different health care organizations in Alexandria. All admitted patients with the diagnosis of ACS throughout a period of 6 months were included in the study (n=606). Discriminatory capacity and calibration of the TIMI and GRACE risk scores for detection of in-hospital mortality and mortality within six months of index admission were assessed.
The study showed that both TIMI and GRACE risk scores had high c statistics of 0.70 or higher. GRACE scores showed equal or higher c statistics than TIMI scores denoting better discriminatory capacity. TIMI risk score showed good calibration while GRACE risk score showed lower calibration capacity with certain patient categories. The GRACE risk score was used to calculate the standardized in-hospital mortality ratio which was higher than 1 for all participating hospitals indicating higher than expected mortality for ACS patients in these hospitals.
GRACE risk score showed good discriminatory capacity, suggesting that it is suitable for clinical use among ACS patients in Alexandria governorate. It was recommended to use GRACE risk score for risk adjustment in quality management activities.
急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的风险分层旨在识别那些可能从进一步检查和治疗中在预后方面获益的患者。此外,卫生当局和医院已将风险分层模型用于质量管理活动。
本研究旨在验证心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)和全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)风险评分对亚历山大省ACS患者死亡率的预测能力。此外,该研究还旨在使用其中一个经过验证的风险评分来比较参与研究的医院之间经风险调整后的死亡率。
该研究在亚历山大市3个不同医疗保健组织所属的医院进行。纳入研究的为在6个月期间内所有诊断为ACS的住院患者(n = 606)。评估了TIMI和GRACE风险评分对检测院内死亡率和首次入院后6个月内死亡率的区分能力和校准情况。
研究表明,TIMI和GRACE风险评分的c统计量均较高,达到0.70或更高。GRACE评分的c统计量等于或高于TIMI评分,表明其区分能力更好。TIMI风险评分显示出良好的校准,而GRACE风险评分在某些患者类别中显示出较低的校准能力。GRACE风险评分用于计算标准化院内死亡率,所有参与研究的医院该值均高于1,表明这些医院中ACS患者的死亡率高于预期。
GRACE风险评分显示出良好的区分能力,表明它适用于亚历山大省ACS患者的临床应用。建议在质量管理活动中使用GRACE风险评分进行风险调整。