Suppr超能文献

一项匹配病例对照研究,旨在探索宫颈癌同步放化疗后巩固化疗的作用。

A matched-case comparison to explore the role of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation in cervical cancer.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.2006. Epub 2010 Nov 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) and CCRT alone in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using medical records from January 2001 to December 2007, 39 patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after CCRT (Group 1) were matched to 39 patients treated with CCRT alone (Group 2). Consolidation chemotherapy consisted of three additional cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 (Day 1) and 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2 per day (Days 1-5) given every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 35 months (range, 8-96 months), 10 (25.6%) and 16 (41.0%) patients showed disease progression in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Distant recurrence with or without locoregional/lymphogenous recurrence occurred more frequently in Group 2 than in Group 1 (23.1% vs. 7.7%, p=0.06). By contrast, there was no difference in locoregional or lymphogenous recurrence between the two groups. The rate of overall survival was higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (92.7% vs. 69.9%, p=0.042), whereas the difference in progression-free survival between the groups was not statistically significant (70.1% vs. 55.1%, p=0.079). Although the difference was not statistically significant, neutropenia was more common in Group 1 than in Group 2 (10.9% vs. 4.7%, p=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Consolidation chemotherapy after CCRT may improve survival and reduce distant recurrence without additional toxicity compared to CCRT alone in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较局部晚期宫颈癌患者同步放化疗(CCRT)后巩固化疗与单纯 CCRT 的疗效和毒性。

方法和材料

通过查阅 2001 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月的病历资料,我们将 39 例接受 CCRT 后巩固化疗的患者(1 组)与 39 例接受单纯 CCRT 的患者(2 组)进行匹配。巩固化疗采用顺铂 60mg/m2(第 1 天)和 5-氟尿嘧啶 1000mg/m2(第 1-5 天),每 3 周重复 3 个周期。主要终点为总生存。

结果

在中位随访期 35 个月(范围 8-96 个月)内,1 组和 2 组分别有 10(25.6%)和 16(41.0%)例患者出现疾病进展。远处复发伴或不伴局部/淋巴结转移在 2 组更为常见(23.1% vs. 7.7%,p=0.06)。相反,两组局部或淋巴结复发无差异。1 组总生存率高于 2 组(92.7% vs. 69.9%,p=0.042),而两组无进展生存率差异无统计学意义(70.1% vs. 55.1%,p=0.079)。虽然差异无统计学意义,但 1 组中性粒细胞减少的发生率高于 2 组(10.9% vs. 4.7%,p=0.07)。

结论

与单纯 CCRT 相比,CCRT 后巩固化疗可能提高局部晚期宫颈癌患者的生存率,降低远处复发率,且毒性无增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验