Fabri Vanessa A, Queiroz Ana C M, Mantoan Henrique, Sanches Solange M, Guimarães Andrea P G, Ribeiro Adriana R G, Souza Ronaldo P, Maya Joyce M L, Santos Elizabeth S, Castro Fabrício S, Lima João P N S, Chen Michael J, Baiocchi Glauco, da Costa Alexandre A B A
Medical Oncology Department, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, 211 Professor Antonio Prudente Street, 01509-900 Liberdade, Brazil.
Gynecology Oncology Department, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, 211 Professor Antonio Prudente Street, 01509-900 Liberdade, Brazil.
J Oncol. 2019 Mar 11;2019:1217838. doi: 10.1155/2019/1217838. eCollection 2019.
Treatment of advanced uterine cervical cancer has advanced little in the last 15 years. Although two phase III trials showed survival benefit with the addition of consolidation chemotherapy (CT) after cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (RTCT), it is not considered standard of care. We aimed to evaluate the benefit of consolidation CT compared to no additional treatment in patients treated with RTCT.
This is a retrospective study including 186 patients with FIGO stage IB2, IIA2, or IIB to IVB (paraaortic lymph nodes only) uterine cervical cancer who were treated with standard RTCT alone or RTCT followed by consolidation CT. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and the risk of distant and local relapses were compared between the two treatment groups.
At 3 years OS was 91% versus 82.3% (p=0.027), PFS 84.3% versus 54.4% (p=0.047), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) 80.4% versus 62.5% (p=0.027) in favor of the consolidation CT group. Multivariate analysis confirmed the benefit of consolidation CT. There was no difference in locoregional free survival (LRFS). Positive lymph node was related to a higher risk of distant relapse. In the lymph node positive subgroup consolidation CT resulted in longer OS (p=0.050), PFS (p=0.014), and DMFS (p=0.022); in the lymph node negative subgroup there was no benefit from consolidation CT.
Use of consolidation CT resulted in longer OS and PFS, mostly due to control of distant relapses. Patients at higher risk of distant relapse showed the greatest benefit. This data generates a hypothesis that could help to better select patients to consolidation CT.
在过去15年中,晚期子宫颈癌的治疗进展甚微。尽管两项III期试验显示,在以顺铂为基础的放化疗(RTCT)后加用巩固化疗(CT)可带来生存获益,但这并不被视为标准治疗方案。我们旨在评估在接受RTCT治疗的患者中,巩固CT与不进行额外治疗相比的获益情况。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了186例FIGO分期为IB2、IIA2或IIB至IVB(仅主动脉旁淋巴结转移)的子宫颈癌患者,这些患者接受了单纯标准RTCT或RTCT后加用巩固CT治疗。比较了两个治疗组的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)以及远处和局部复发风险。
3年时,巩固CT组的OS为91%,而未进行巩固治疗组为82.3%(p = 0.027);PFS为84.3% 对54.4%(p = 0.047);无远处转移生存期(DMFS)为80.4% 对62.5%(p = 0.027),巩固CT组更具优势。多因素分析证实了巩固CT的获益。局部区域无复发生存期(LRFS)无差异。阳性淋巴结与更高的远处复发风险相关。在淋巴结阳性亚组中,巩固CT导致更长的OS(p = 0.050)、PFS(p = 0.014)和DMFS(p = 0.022);在淋巴结阴性亚组中,巩固CT无获益。
使用巩固CT可延长OS和PFS,主要是由于控制了远处复发。远处复发风险较高的患者获益最大。这些数据提出了一个假设,有助于更好地选择适合巩固CT治疗的患者。