Suppr超能文献

一项比较局部晚期宫颈癌患者同期放化疗与同期放化疗后辅助化疗的随机对照临床试验:ACTLACC 试验。

A randomized controlled trial comparing concurrent chemoradiation versus concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: ACTLACC trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;30(4):e82. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e82. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare response rate and survivals of locally advanced stage cervical cancer patients who had standard concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) alone to those who had adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after CCRT.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-70 years who had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB-IVA without para-aortic lymph node enlargement, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores 0-2, and non-aggressive histopathology were randomized to have CCRT with weekly cisplatin followed by observation (arm A) or by ACT with paclitaxel plus carboplatin every 4 weeks for 3 cycles (arm B).

RESULTS

Data analysis of 259 patients showed no significant difference in complete responses at 4 months after treatment between arm A (n=129) and arm B (n=130): 94.1% vs. 87.0% (p=0.154) respectively. With the median follow-up of 27.4 months, 15.5% of patients in arm A and 10.8% in arm B experienced recurrences (p=0.123). There were no significant differences of overall or loco-regional failure. However, systemic recurrences were significantly lower in arm B than arm A: 5.4% vs. 10.1% (p=0.029). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) of the patients in both arms were not significantly different. The hazard ratio of PFS and OS of arm B compared to arm A were 1.26 (95% CI=0.82-1.96; p=0.293) and 1.42 (95% CI=0.81-2.49; p=0.221) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ACT with paclitaxel plus carboplatin after CCRT did not improve response rate and survival compared to CCRT alone. Only significant decrease of systemic recurrences with ACT was observed, but not overall or loco-regional failure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02036164, Thai Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: TCTR 20140106001.

摘要

目的

比较局部晚期宫颈癌患者接受标准同步放化疗(CCRT)加辅助化疗(ACT)与单纯接受 CCRT 的缓解率和生存率。

方法

年龄在 18-70 岁之间、国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期为 IIB-IVA 期、无主动脉旁淋巴结肿大、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分 0-2 分、非侵袭性组织病理学的患者被随机分为两组:接受每周顺铂联合 CCRT 治疗,随后观察(A 组)或接受紫杉醇加卡铂每 4 周 3 个周期的 ACT(B 组)。

结果

对 259 例患者的数据进行分析显示,两组患者在治疗后 4 个月时完全缓解率无显著差异:A 组(n=129)为 94.1%,B 组(n=130)为 87.0%(p=0.154)。中位随访 27.4 个月后,A 组和 B 组分别有 15.5%和 10.8%的患者复发(p=0.123)。两组患者的总生存率和局部区域无复发生存率无显著差异。然而,B 组患者的系统复发率明显低于 A 组:5.4%比 10.1%(p=0.029)。两组患者的 3 年无进展生存率(PFS)和 3 年总生存率(OS)无显著差异。B 组患者的 PFS 和 OS 的风险比与 A 组相比分别为 1.26(95%可信区间为 0.82-1.96;p=0.293)和 1.42(95%可信区间为 0.81-2.49;p=0.221)。

结论

与单纯 CCRT 相比,CCRT 加紫杉醇加卡铂的 ACT 并不能提高缓解率和生存率。仅观察到 ACT 可显著降低系统复发率,但对总生存率和局部区域无复发生存率无影响。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02036164,泰国临床试验注册中心标识符:TCTR 20140106001。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced cervical adenocarcinoma.晚期宫颈腺癌的放化疗及辅助化疗。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.033. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验