Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;30(4):e82. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e82. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
To compare response rate and survivals of locally advanced stage cervical cancer patients who had standard concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) alone to those who had adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after CCRT.
Patients aged 18-70 years who had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB-IVA without para-aortic lymph node enlargement, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores 0-2, and non-aggressive histopathology were randomized to have CCRT with weekly cisplatin followed by observation (arm A) or by ACT with paclitaxel plus carboplatin every 4 weeks for 3 cycles (arm B).
Data analysis of 259 patients showed no significant difference in complete responses at 4 months after treatment between arm A (n=129) and arm B (n=130): 94.1% vs. 87.0% (p=0.154) respectively. With the median follow-up of 27.4 months, 15.5% of patients in arm A and 10.8% in arm B experienced recurrences (p=0.123). There were no significant differences of overall or loco-regional failure. However, systemic recurrences were significantly lower in arm B than arm A: 5.4% vs. 10.1% (p=0.029). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) of the patients in both arms were not significantly different. The hazard ratio of PFS and OS of arm B compared to arm A were 1.26 (95% CI=0.82-1.96; p=0.293) and 1.42 (95% CI=0.81-2.49; p=0.221) respectively.
ACT with paclitaxel plus carboplatin after CCRT did not improve response rate and survival compared to CCRT alone. Only significant decrease of systemic recurrences with ACT was observed, but not overall or loco-regional failure.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02036164, Thai Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: TCTR 20140106001.
比较局部晚期宫颈癌患者接受标准同步放化疗(CCRT)加辅助化疗(ACT)与单纯接受 CCRT 的缓解率和生存率。
年龄在 18-70 岁之间、国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期为 IIB-IVA 期、无主动脉旁淋巴结肿大、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分 0-2 分、非侵袭性组织病理学的患者被随机分为两组:接受每周顺铂联合 CCRT 治疗,随后观察(A 组)或接受紫杉醇加卡铂每 4 周 3 个周期的 ACT(B 组)。
对 259 例患者的数据进行分析显示,两组患者在治疗后 4 个月时完全缓解率无显著差异:A 组(n=129)为 94.1%,B 组(n=130)为 87.0%(p=0.154)。中位随访 27.4 个月后,A 组和 B 组分别有 15.5%和 10.8%的患者复发(p=0.123)。两组患者的总生存率和局部区域无复发生存率无显著差异。然而,B 组患者的系统复发率明显低于 A 组:5.4%比 10.1%(p=0.029)。两组患者的 3 年无进展生存率(PFS)和 3 年总生存率(OS)无显著差异。B 组患者的 PFS 和 OS 的风险比与 A 组相比分别为 1.26(95%可信区间为 0.82-1.96;p=0.293)和 1.42(95%可信区间为 0.81-2.49;p=0.221)。
与单纯 CCRT 相比,CCRT 加紫杉醇加卡铂的 ACT 并不能提高缓解率和生存率。仅观察到 ACT 可显著降低系统复发率,但对总生存率和局部区域无复发生存率无影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02036164,泰国临床试验注册中心标识符:TCTR 20140106001。