Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011 Apr;19(2):167-76. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2091149. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
This study aims to analyze viscoelastic properties of the wrist in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in comparison with the clinical score of severity. Forty-five patients with PD and 12 healthy volunteers participated in this study. Severity of rigidity at the wrist was rated by a neurologist just before the experiment. Wrist joint torque resistive to the imposed movement was measured. Three different models, (identical in structure, only different in the number of parameters for extension and flexion phases) were used in identification of viscoelastic properties: 1) one damping constant and one spring constant throughout all phases, 2) two damping constants for each phase and one spring constant throughout all phases, and 3) two damping constants and two spring constants for each phase. Normalized work and impulse suggested in the literature were also calculated. Spring constants of different models and phases showed comparable correlation with rigidity score ( r=0.68-0.73). In terms of the correlation of damping constant with clinical rigidity score, model 1 ( r = 0.90) was better than models 2 and 3 ( r=0.59 - 0.71). These results suggest that the clinical rigidity score is better represented by the mean viscosity during both flexion and extension. In models with two dampers (model 2 and 3), the damping constant was greater during extension than flexion in patients , in contrast that there was no phase difference in normal subjects. This suggests that in contrast with normal subjects, phase-dependent viscosity may be an inherent feature of PD. Although work and impulse were correlated with clinical rigidity score ( r = 0.11 - 0.84), they could not represent the phase-dependent rigidity inherent in PD. In conclusion, the viscosity of model 1 would be appropriate for quantification of clinical ratings of rigidity and that of model 2 for distinction of PD and also for investigation of phase-dependent characteristics in parkinsonian rigidity.
本研究旨在分析帕金森病(PD)患者腕部的粘弹性特性,并与临床严重程度评分进行比较。本研究纳入了 45 名 PD 患者和 12 名健康志愿者。在实验前,由神经科医生对患者腕部的僵硬程度进行评分。测量了对抗施加运动的腕关节扭矩的阻力。在识别粘弹性特性时,使用了三种不同的模型(结构相同,仅在伸展和弯曲阶段的参数数量上有所不同):1)整个阶段只有一个阻尼常数和一个弹簧常数,2)每个阶段有两个阻尼常数和一个弹簧常数,以及 3)每个阶段有两个阻尼常数和两个弹簧常数。文献中还计算了归一化功和冲量。不同模型和阶段的弹簧常数与僵硬评分具有相似的相关性(r=0.68-0.73)。就阻尼常数与临床僵硬评分的相关性而言,模型 1(r=0.90)优于模型 2 和 3(r=0.59-0.71)。这些结果表明,在伸展和弯曲过程中,平均粘性更能代表临床僵硬评分。在具有两个阻尼器的模型中(模型 2 和 3),与健康受试者相比,患者在伸展时的阻尼常数大于弯曲时的阻尼常数,而健康受试者在这两个阶段没有相位差异。这表明与健康受试者相比,相位依赖性粘性可能是 PD 的固有特征。尽管功和冲量与临床僵硬评分相关(r=0.11-0.84),但它们无法代表 PD 中固有的相位依赖性僵硬。综上所述,模型 1 的粘性适合量化临床僵硬评分,模型 2 的粘性适合区分 PD,还可用于研究帕金森氏僵硬的相位依赖性特征。