Suppr超能文献

应对压力、焦虑和失眠的非药物治疗障碍:家庭医生开苯二氮䓬类药物的态度。

Barriers to nonpharmacologic treatments for stress, anxiety, and insomnia: family physicians' attitudes toward benzodiazepine prescribing.

机构信息

University of Antwerp, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute and Centre for General Practice, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2010 Nov;56(11):e398-406.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the attitudes of FPs toward benzodiazepine (BZD) prescribing and the perceived barriers to nonpharmacologic approaches to managing stress, anxiety, and insomnia.

DESIGN

A questionnaire including 32 statements about treatment of insomnia, stress, and anxiety.

SETTING

Local quality groups for FPs in Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 948 Belgian FPs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Barriers to using nonpharmacologic approaches in family practice.

RESULTS

We identified 3 different groups of FPs according to their attitudes about BZD prescribing. A first relatively big group of FPs (39%) were not really concerned about the risks of BZD prescribing. Those in the second group (17%) were aware of the problems associated with BZDs, but did not perceive it to be their role to use nonpharmacologic approaches in family practice. Those in the third group (44%) were concerned about BZD prescribing and found it to be a "bad solution," but were faced with various barriers to applying nonpharmacologic approaches. Surprisingly, we found that nearly 97% of FPs thought that most people were eligible for nonpharmacologic approaches, but experienced implementation barriers at the level of the patient, the level of the FP, and the level of the health care system.

CONCLUSION

Using different education and behavioural-change strategies for different FP groups seems important. A large group of FPs does not find prescribing BZDs to be problematic. Sensitizing and alerting FPs to this issue remains very important.

摘要

目的

探讨家庭医生(FP)对苯二氮䓬类药物(BZD)处方的态度,以及对非药物方法管理压力、焦虑和失眠的认知障碍。

设计

包括 32 个关于失眠、压力和焦虑治疗的陈述的问卷。

地点

比利时的当地 FP 质量小组。

参与者

共 948 名比利时 FP。

主要观察指标

在家庭实践中使用非药物方法的障碍。

结果

根据他们对 BZD 处方的态度,我们确定了 3 组不同的 FP。第一组相对较大的 FP(39%)对 BZD 处方的风险并不真正关注。第二组(17%)意识到与 BZDs 相关的问题,但不认为在家庭实践中使用非药物方法是他们的职责。第三组(44%)对 BZD 处方感到担忧,并认为这是一个“糟糕的解决方案”,但在应用非药物方法方面面临各种障碍。令人惊讶的是,我们发现近 97%的 FP 认为大多数人都有资格接受非药物方法,但在患者、FP 和医疗保健系统层面都存在实施障碍。

结论

对不同的 FP 群体使用不同的教育和行为改变策略似乎很重要。很大一部分 FP 并不认为开具 BZD 有问题。提醒和引起 FP 对这个问题的重视仍然非常重要。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Withdrawing benzodiazepines in primary care.在基层医疗中停用苯二氮䓬类药物。
CNS Drugs. 2009;23(1):19-34. doi: 10.2165/0023210-200923010-00002.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验