University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):188-94. doi: 10.1177/0363546510383394. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
The tissue-suture interface remains the most common site of failure in rotator cuff repairs. Improving stitch strengths may lead to lower failure rates.
To compare biomechanical properties of 3 self-cinching stitches to the simple, mattress, modified Mason-Allen, and massive cuff stitches.
Controlled laboratory study.
In sum, 336 sheep infraspinatus tendon grafts were randomized among 7 stitches. Each graft was cyclically loaded on a mechanical testing system from 5 to 30 N for 20 cycles and then loaded to failure. A mixed-effect multivariate regression model was used to test significance of suture type on cyclic elongation, peak-to-peak displacement, and ultimate load. Estimated means and standard deviations are reported from the regression model.
Ultimate load for the simple stitch was significantly lower than for the other stitches. The lasso-loop and mattress stitch demonstrated similar ultimate loads. The double-cinch had a higher ultimate load than the lasso-loop or mattress stitch, although it was significantly weaker than the modified Mason-Allen, lasso-mattress, and massive cuff. The lasso-mattress had a superior ultimate load to the modified Mason-Allen and a similar ultimate load to the massive cuff stitch. One significant difference was found in cyclic elongation (1.42 mm for the simple to 1.80 mm for the double-cinch), and the cinching mechanism accounted for 0.2-mm higher elongation.
Self-cinching stitches lead to superior tissue-holding strength at the tissue-suture interface when compared with equivalent non-self-cinching stitches. Self-cinching stitches have greater elongation values. How these differences in cyclic elongation clinically influence gap formation at the repair site is unknown. The greater displacement seen in the self-cinching stitches is a potential concern because minimal gap formation is desired for a strong repair.
The lasso-loop stitch is a stronger alternative to a simple stitch, and the double-cinch and lasso-mattress stitches are stronger alternatives to a mattress stitch.
组织-缝线界面仍然是肩袖修复中最常见的失效部位。提高缝线强度可能会降低失败率。
比较 3 种自收紧缝线与简单、褥式、改良 Mason-Allen 和巨大肩袖缝线的生物力学特性。
对照实验室研究。
总共将 336 只绵羊冈下肌腱移植物随机分为 7 种缝线。每个移植物在机械测试系统上从 5 到 30N 循环加载 20 次,然后加载至失效。使用混合效应多变量回归模型测试缝线类型对循环伸长、峰峰值位移和极限载荷的显著性。从回归模型报告估计均值和标准差。
简单缝线的极限载荷明显低于其他缝线。套索环和褥式缝线的极限载荷相似。双收紧缝线的极限载荷高于套索环或褥式缝线,但明显弱于改良 Mason-Allen、套索褥式和巨大肩袖缝线。套索褥式缝线的极限载荷优于改良 Mason-Allen,与巨大肩袖缝线的极限载荷相似。仅在循环伸长方面存在显著差异(简单缝线为 1.42mm,双收紧缝线为 1.80mm),收紧机制导致伸长增加 0.2mm。
与等效的非自收紧缝线相比,自收紧缝线在组织-缝线界面处具有更好的组织保持力。自收紧缝线的伸长值更大。这些循环伸长差异在临床上如何影响修复部位的间隙形成尚不清楚。自收紧缝线中观察到的较大位移是一个潜在的问题,因为对于坚固的修复,需要最小的间隙形成。
套索环缝线是简单缝线的更强替代品,双收紧和套索褥式缝线是褥式缝线的更强替代品。