Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
JAMA. 2010 Nov 24;304(20):2263-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1690. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
Although the heritability of atrial fibrillation (AF) is established, the contribution of familial AF to predicting new-onset AF remains unknown.
To determine whether familial occurrence of AF is associated with new-onset AF beyond established risk factors.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Framingham Heart Study, a prospective community-based cohort study started in 1948. Original and Offspring Cohort participants were aged at least 30 years, were free of AF at the baseline examination, and had at least 1 parent or sibling enrolled in the study. The 4421 participants in this analysis (mean age, 54 [SD, 13] years; 54% women) were followed up through December 31, 2007.
Incremental predictive value of incorporating different features of familial AF (any familial AF, premature familial AF [onset ≤65 years old], number of affected relatives, and youngest age of onset in a relative) into a risk model for new-onset AF.
Across 11,971 examinations during the period 1968-2007, 440 participants developed AF. Familial AF occurred among 1185 participants (26.8%) and premature familial AF occurred among 351 participants (7.9%). Atrial fibrillation occurred more frequently among participants with familial AF than without familial AF (unadjusted absolute event rates of 5.8% and 3.1%, respectively). The association was not attenuated by adjustment for AF risk factors (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.74) or reported AF-related genetic variants. Among the different features of familial AF examined, premature familial AF was associated with improved discrimination beyond traditional risk factors to the greatest extent (traditional risk factors, C statistic, 0.842 [95% CI, 0.826-0.858]; premature familial AF, C statistic, 0.846 [95% CI, 0.831-0.862]; P = .004). Modest changes in integrated discrimination improvement were observed with premature familial AF (2.1%). Net reclassification improvement (assessed using 8-year risk thresholds of <5%, 5%-10%, and >10%) did not change significantly with premature familial AF (index statistic, 0.011; 95% CI, -0.021 to 0.042; P = .51), although categoryless net reclassification was improved (index statistic, 0.127; 95% CI, 0.064-0.189; P = .009).
In this cohort, familial AF was associated with an increased risk of AF that was not attenuated by adjustment for AF risk factors including genetic variants. Assessment of premature familial AF was associated with a very slight increase in predictive accuracy compared with traditional risk factors.
尽管已经确定了心房颤动(AF)的遗传性,但家族性 AF 对预测新发 AF 的作用仍不清楚。
确定家族性 AF 的发生是否与既定危险因素以外的新发 AF 相关。
设计、地点和参与者:弗雷明汉心脏研究,这是一项始于 1948 年的前瞻性社区队列研究。原始和后代队列参与者年龄至少 30 岁,在基线检查时无 AF,并且至少有 1 位父母或兄弟姐妹参加了该研究。本分析中的 4421 名参与者(平均年龄 54 [SD,13] 岁;54%为女性)随访至 2007 年 12 月 31 日。
将家族性 AF 的不同特征(任何家族性 AF、早发性家族性 AF[发病年龄≤65 岁]、受影响亲属的数量以及亲属中最早的发病年龄)纳入新发性 AF 风险模型的增量预测值。
在 1968 年至 2007 年期间的 11971 次检查中,有 440 名参与者发生了 AF。1185 名参与者(26.8%)出现家族性 AF,351 名参与者(7.9%)出现早发性家族性 AF。有家族性 AF 的参与者发生 AF 的频率高于没有家族性 AF 的参与者(未经调整的绝对事件发生率分别为 5.8%和 3.1%)。这种关联在调整 AF 危险因素后并未减弱(多变量调整后的危险比为 1.40;95%置信区间[CI]为 1.13-1.74)或报告的 AF 相关遗传变异。在所检查的家族性 AF 的不同特征中,早发性家族性 AF 与传统危险因素相比,在最大程度上改善了区分度(传统危险因素,C 统计量为 0.842[95%CI 为 0.826-0.858];早发性家族性 AF,C 统计量为 0.846[95%CI 为 0.831-0.862];P=.004)。早发性家族性 AF 观察到综合判别改善的适度变化(2.1%)。净重新分类改善(使用 8 年风险阈值<5%、5%-10%和>10%评估)并未因早发性家族性 AF 而显著改变(指数统计量为 0.011;95%CI 为-0.021 至 0.042;P=.51),尽管无类别净重新分类得到改善(指数统计量为 0.127;95%CI 为 0.064-0.189;P=.009)。
在本队列中,家族性 AF 与 AF 风险增加相关,这种关联在调整 AF 危险因素(包括遗传变异)后并未减弱。与传统危险因素相比,评估早发性家族性 AF 与预测准确性的微小增加相关。