Andrology Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tygerberg Academic Hospital and University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa.
Asian J Androl. 2011 Jan;13(1):59-68. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.67. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
The measurement or evaluation and clinical significance of human sperm morphology has always been and still is a controversial aspect of the semen analysis for the determination of a male's fertility potential. In this review the background of the development of the evaluation criteria for sperm morphology will be discussed. Aspects of criticism on the strict criteria definition and use of the criteria for sperm morphology evaluation will be discussed as well as possible reasons for the decline in normal sperm morphology values and how we can compromise for this phenomenon resulting in the very low normal reference value as published in the 2010 WHO manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. One of the possible solutions may be to give more attention to a limited number of abnormal sperm morphology categories and the inclusion of sperm morphology patterns. It is concluded in this review that if done correctly and with care and with strict application of existing guidelines as outlined in the 2010 WHO manual, sperm morphology measurement still has a very important role to play in the clinical evaluation of male fertility potential.
人类精子形态的测量或评估及其临床意义一直是、并且仍然是精液分析中用于确定男性生育潜能的一个有争议的方面。在这篇综述中,将讨论精子形态评估标准的发展背景。本文还将讨论对精子形态评估标准的严格定义和使用的批评意见,以及正常精子形态值下降的可能原因,以及我们如何为此现象做出妥协,导致 2010 年世界卫生组织人类精液检查与处理手册中公布的非常低的正常参考值。可能的解决方案之一可能是更多地关注少数异常精子形态类别和精子形态模式的纳入。本文的结论是,如果正确地、谨慎地并严格应用 2010 年世界卫生组织手册中概述的现有指南进行精子形态测量,它在男性生育潜能的临床评估中仍然具有非常重要的作用。