Asian J Androl. 2010 Jan;12(1):26-32. doi: 10.1038/aja.2008.58.
The new World Health Organization (WHO) Manual for Semen Analysis contains several improvements. One is that the 20 million spermatozoa per mL paradigm has been ousted in favour of proper calculations of lower reference limits for semen from men, whose partners had a time-to-pregnancy of 12 months or less. The recommendation to grade the progressive motility as described in the third and fourth editions of the WHO manual was not evidence-based, and WHO was therefore motivated to abandon it. However, the new recommendation is not evidence-based either, and it is difficult to understand the rational for the new assessment. It may have been a compromise to avoid returning to the rather robust system recommended in the first edition (1980). The unconditional recommendation of the 'Tygerberg strict criteria' is not evidence-based, and seems to be the result of an unfortunate bias in the composition of the Committee in favour of individuals known to support the 'strict criteria' method. This recommendation will have negative effects on the development of andrology as a scientific field. Given the importance of the WHO manual, it is unfortunate that the recommendations for such important variables, as motility and morphology, lack evidence-based support.
世界卫生组织(WHO)新精液分析手册有几处改进。其中之一是,每毫升 2000 万精子的范式已被摒弃,转而采用适当的计算方法,确定 12 个月或更短时间内怀孕的男性伴侣的精液参考下限。WHO 手册第三和第四版中描述的渐进性运动分级推荐缺乏循证依据,因此 WHO 决定放弃这一推荐。然而,新的推荐也缺乏循证依据,而且很难理解新评估的合理性。这可能是为了避免回到第一版(1980 年)中推荐的更为可靠的系统而做出的妥协。无条件推荐“泰格伯格严格标准”缺乏循证依据,似乎是委员会组成人员中存在一种不幸的偏见,偏向于已知支持“严格标准”方法的个人。这一推荐将对男性学作为一个科学领域的发展产生负面影响。鉴于 WHO 手册的重要性,令人遗憾的是,对运动和形态等重要变量的推荐缺乏循证依据。