Suppr超能文献

[一种用于鉴定β-内酰胺酶阴性、氨苄西林耐药流感嗜血杆菌的简单纸片扩散试验——头孢氨苄、磺苄西林和头孢克洛纸片的应用]

[A simple disk diffusion test to identify beta-lactamase-negative, ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae--application of cephalexin, cefsulodin and cefaclor disks].

作者信息

Endo Ryuichi, Yamane Nobuhisa, Tamayose Miyako H, Uchibori Kyoko K, Nakasone Isamu

机构信息

Development Division, Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Yuki 307-0036, Japan.

出版信息

Rinsho Byori. 2010 Oct;58(10):963-71.

Abstract

Currently, beta-lactamase-negative (BLN) ampicillin-resistant (AR) strains of Haemophilus influenzae are prevalent in Japan. BLNAR strains are defined by the presence of specific mutation(s) in the ftsI gene but are not phenotypically distinguishable by ampicillin (ABPC) susceptibility. In the present study, we showed that cephalexin (CEX), cefsulodin (CFS), and cefaclor (CCL) disk diffusion tests can be effectively used to identify BLNAR strains. A total of 169 clinical isolates of BLN H. influenzae, consisting of 113 of BLNAR and 56 of BLN, ampicillin-susceptible (AS), were included. All the isolates were genetically defined by detection of the TEM gene and partial sequencing of the ftsI gene. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard broth microdilution and disk diffusion tests for ABPC provided 20% and 19% false susceptible rates, respectively. Alternatively, 34 cephem agents were tested using disk diffusion. Of the agents tested, CEX, CFS, and CCL disks could effectively discriminate between BLNAR and BLNAS isolates. All the BLNAS isolates showed visible growth inhibitory zones around CEX and CFS disks, but 108 (95.6%) and 106 (93.8%) BLNAR isolates did not. The results indicated 100% predictive values (PVs) for BLNAR and PVs for BLNAS were 91.8% for CEX and 88.9% for CFS. The CLSI-based interpretations for CCL (> or =20 mm) also highly correlated with BLNAR and BLNAS, PVs for BLNAR and for BLNAS being 100% and 93.3%, respectively. With simplicity and discriminability of the test method, we recommend a CEX disk diffusion test in combination with a rapid beta-lactamase test to identify BLNAR isolates in clinical laboratories.

摘要

目前,β-内酰胺酶阴性(BLN)的耐氨苄西林(AR)流感嗜血杆菌菌株在日本很普遍。BLNAR菌株是由ftsI基因中特定突变的存在所定义的,但在氨苄西林(ABPC)敏感性方面在表型上无法区分。在本研究中,我们表明头孢氨苄(CEX)、头孢磺啶(CFS)和头孢克洛(CCL)纸片扩散试验可有效用于鉴定BLNAR菌株。总共纳入了169株BLN流感嗜血杆菌临床分离株,其中包括113株BLNAR和56株BLN、氨苄西林敏感(AS)株。所有分离株均通过检测TEM基因和ftsI基因的部分测序进行基因鉴定。临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的ABPC标准肉汤微量稀释法和纸片扩散试验的假敏感率分别为20%和19%。另外,使用纸片扩散法对34种头孢菌素类药物进行了测试。在所测试的药物中,CEX、CFS和CCL纸片可有效区分BLNAR和BLNAS分离株。所有BLNAS分离株在CEX和CFS纸片周围均显示出可见的生长抑制圈,但108株(95.6%)和106株(93.8%)BLNAR分离株没有。结果表明,CEX对BLNAR的预测值(PV)为100%,对BLNAS的PV为91.8%,CFS对BLNAS的PV为88.9%。基于CLSI的CCL解释(≥20 mm)也与BLNAR和BLNAS高度相关,BLNAR和BLNAS的PV分别为100%和93.3%。鉴于该检测方法的简便性和可区分性,我们建议在临床实验室中使用CEX纸片扩散试验结合快速β-内酰胺酶试验来鉴定BLNAR分离株。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验