Retchin S M, Brown B
Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298.
Am J Public Health. 1990 Apr;80(4):411-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.4.411.
The quality of ambulatory care received by Medicare recipients who enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) was compared to the care received by fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare recipients, in a quasi-experimental, non-randomized design. Both samples were drawn from the four major geographic areas in the country, and included two types of HMO practices: staff/group models, and independent practice associations (IPAs). A panel of expert physicians developed criteria for evaluating ambulatory care, and medical record abstractions using these criteria were performed on 1,590 outpatient records: 777 FFS and 813 HMO (441 staff/group, 372 IPA). While individual items of medical histories and physical examinations were performed most often for staff/group HMO patients and least often in FFS patients, odds ratios (OR) for performance in staff/group HMO patients were particularly large for health maintenance items: tonometry (OR = 8.4), mammography (OR = 2.7), pelvic examination (OR = 5.3), rectal examination (OR = 2.9), fecal occult blood test (OR = 3.3). The results suggest that recommended elements of routine and preventive care are more likely to be performed for Medicare enrollees in staff/group HMOs than in FFS settings.
在一项准实验性、非随机设计中,对参加健康维护组织(HMO)的医疗保险受益人与按服务收费(FFS)的医疗保险受益人所接受的门诊医疗质量进行了比较。两个样本均取自该国四个主要地理区域,包括两种类型的HMO医疗机构:员工/团体模式和独立执业协会(IPA)。一个专家医生小组制定了评估门诊医疗的标准,并使用这些标准对1590份门诊病历进行了医疗记录摘要分析:777份FFS病历和813份HMO病历(441份员工/团体模式病历,372份IPA病历)。虽然员工/团体模式HMO患者最常进行个人病史和体格检查项目,而FFS患者最少进行,但员工/团体模式HMO患者在健康维护项目方面的表现优势尤为明显:眼压测量(优势比[OR]=8.4)、乳房X光检查(OR=2.7)、盆腔检查(OR=5.3)、直肠检查(OR=2.9)、粪便潜血试验(OR=3.3)。结果表明,与FFS模式相比,员工/团体模式的HMO中,医疗保险参保者更有可能接受常规和预防性护理的推荐项目。